1058 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11655812)
21. Public funding of medically necessary abortions is not required under the Medicaid Act: Harris v. McRae, 100 S.Ct. 2671 (1980).
Gray AD
Tex Tech Law Rev; 1981; 12(2):483-99. PubMed ID: 11655635
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. The future of abortion.
McDaniel A
Newsweek; 1989 Jul; 114(3):14-21, 24-27. PubMed ID: 11655929
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. A decade of cementing the mosaic of Roe v. Wade: is the composite a message to leave abortion alone?
Kudner KE
Univ Toledo Law Rev; 1984; 15(2):681-753. PubMed ID: 11649780
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. The unborn and the born again.
New Repub; 1977 Jul; 177(27):5-6+. PubMed ID: 11663777
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Abortion, absolutism, and compromise.
Carter SL
Yale Law J; 1991 Jun; 100(8):2747-66. PubMed ID: 11656152
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. The Human Life Federalism Amendment: an assessment.
Caron WR
Cathol Lawyer; 1982; 27(2):87-111. PubMed ID: 11655614
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Privacy II: state attempts to regulate abortion.
Prall S
Annu Surv Am Law; 1988; 1(2):385-427. PubMed ID: 11652657
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Toward a more perfect union: a federal cause of action for physician aid-in-dying.
Robichaud TD
Univ Mich J Law Reform; 1994; 27(2):521-64. PubMed ID: 11656405
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Abortion funding and wise social policy: implications of Harris v. McRae.
Gold RB
Women Health; 1980; 5(4):79-83. PubMed ID: 11655640
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Abortion's shrinking majority.
Murphy J
Time; 1986 Jun; 127(25):30-1. PubMed ID: 11645638
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Constitutional law--substantive due process--abortion--reasonable statutory recordkeeping and reporting requirements upheld.
Brigh Young Univ Law Rev; 1976; 1976(4):977-99. PubMed ID: 11664779
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Abortion and the law in 1980.
Paul EW; Schaap P
NY Law Sch Law Rev; 1980; 25(3):497-525. PubMed ID: 11664083
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Enforcement of state abortion statutes after Roe: a state-by-state analysis.
Linton PB
Univ Detroit Law Rev; 1990; 67(2):157-259. PubMed ID: 11659261
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. A critique of the abortion funding decisions: on private rights in the public sector.
Goldstein LF
Hastings Constit Law Q; 1981; 8(2):313-42. PubMed ID: 11655390
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Tribe's judicious feminism -- Abortion: The Clash of Absolutes.
Allen AL
Stanford Law Rev; 1991 Nov; 44(1):179-203. PubMed ID: 11659573
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Webster v. Reproductive Health Services: a path to constitutional equalibrium.
Chopko ME
Campbell Law Rev; 1990; 12(2):181-220. PubMed ID: 11656527
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. The constitutionality of the Freedom of Choice Act of 1993.
Axel DA
Hastings Law J; 1994; 45(3):641-65. PubMed ID: 11656418
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Oh my God, I'm pregnant.
Minter CV
Ohio North Univ Law Rev; 1973; 1(1):119-29. PubMed ID: 11663469
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Constitutional law--abortion funding and the demise of the maternal health consideration--Harris v. McRae, 100 S.Ct. 2671 (1980).
Libby FA
Suffolk Univ Law Rev; 1981 Apr; 15(2):285-305. PubMed ID: 11655650
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. Webster, privacy, and RU486.
Haas EM
J Contemp Health Law Policy; 1990; 6():277-96. PubMed ID: 11645679
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
