490 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11655813)
1. Roe v. Wade: a retrospective look at a judicial oxymoron.
Coleman JJ
St Louis Univ Law J; 1984 Dec; 29(7):7-44. PubMed ID: 11655813
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Unenumerated rights: whether and how Roe should be overruled.
Dworkin R
Univ Chic Law Rev; 1992; 59(1):381-432. PubMed ID: 11656301
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Abortion and the right of privacy.
Ortega ML
Philipp Law J; 1973; 48(4-5):652-95. PubMed ID: 11663743
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. The constitutional morality of abortion.
Brownstein A; Dau P
Boston Coll Law Rev; 1992 Jul; 33(4):689-761. PubMed ID: 11656217
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. The Webster amicus curiae briefs: perspectives on the abortion controversy and the role of the Supreme Court -- amici for appellees.
Annas GJ
Am J Law Med; 1989; 15(2-3):169-203. PubMed ID: 11644396
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Life's Dominion: a review essay.
Bradley GV
Notre Dame Law Rev; 1993; 69(2):329-91. PubMed ID: 11656437
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Abortion: round 1.
Dworkin R; Kay J; Schnaubelt CM; Orlans H; Rabinowitz S; Bienenstock AH; Bork ME; Lewy G; Hyde HJ; Singer SF; Gellman M; Ewy CR; Gow HB; Jenks BP; Olson E; Wile F; Cohn RG; Oakes ET; Elshtain JB; Wilson JQ
Commentary; 1994 Mar; 97(3):2-19. PubMed ID: 11659743
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Death before life: abortion as a moral symbol.
Frankel LH; Flynn JJ
J Contemp Law; 1975; 1(2):267-85. PubMed ID: 11662359
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Abortion and section 7 of the Charter: proposing a constitutionally valid foetal protection law.
McCourt KM; Love DJ
Manit Law J; 1989; 18(3):365-94. PubMed ID: 11656021
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Social commentary: values and legal personhood.
Parness JA
West VA Law Rev; 1981; 83(3):487-503. PubMed ID: 11655572
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Abortion rights in America.
Bullock JR
Brigh Young Univ Law Rev; 1994; 1994(1):63-94. PubMed ID: 11656488
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Roe v. Wade and the traditional legal standards concerning pregnancy.
Hopkin WR
Temple Law Q; 1974; 47(4):715-38. PubMed ID: 11664349
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Roe v. Wade and Doe v. Bolton: the compelling state interest test in substantive due process.
Gelinas A
Wash Lee Law Rev; 1973; 30(3):628-46. PubMed ID: 11663508
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Implications of the coming retreat from Roe v. Wade.
Rice CF
J Contemp Health Law Policy; 1988; 4():1-21. PubMed ID: 11645610
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. "Even by commonsense morality": Morgentaler, Borowski, and the Constitution of Canada.
McConnell ML
Can Bar Rev; 1989 Mar; 68(1):765-96. PubMed ID: 11656020
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Woman, womb, and bodily integrity.
Neff CL
Yale J Law Fem; 1991; 3(2):327-53. PubMed ID: 11656226
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. A decision-theoretic reconstruction of Roe v. Wade.
Lockhart T
Public Aff Q; 1991 Jul; 5(3):243-58. PubMed ID: 11656064
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. The Supreme Court, the "facts of life" and "the thoughtful part of the nation.
Destro RA
Hum Life Rev; 1994; 20(3):28-48. PubMed ID: 11656359
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Technological advances and Roe v. Wade: the need to rethink abortion law.
Martyn K
UCLA Law Rev; 1982; 29(5-6):1194-215. PubMed ID: 11655743
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Roe v. Wade: its impact on rights of choice in human reproduction.
Patton DE
Columbia Human Rights Law Rev; 1973; 5(2):497-521. PubMed ID: 11663415
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
