261 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11655824)
1. Abortion, amniocentesis and the law.
Dickens BM
Am J Comp Law; 1986; 34(2):249-70. PubMed ID: 11655824
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. The right to begin life with sound body and mind: fetal patients and conflicts with their mothers.
Dougherty CJ
Univ Detroit Law Rev; 1985; 63(1-2):89-117. PubMed ID: 11659281
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. The duty to prevent handicaps: laws promoting the prevention of handicaps to newborns.
Parness JA
West New Engl Law Rev; 1983; 5(3):431-64. PubMed ID: 11658603
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Wrongful life, wrongful birth, and wrongful pregnancy: judicial divergence in the birth-related torts.
DeVries DL; Rifkin AM
Forum; 1985; 20(2):207-21. PubMed ID: 11658575
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. New constitutional and penal theory in Spanish abortion law.
Stith R
Am J Comp Law; 1987; 35(3):513-58. PubMed ID: 11655866
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Selective abortion and the diagnosis of fetal damage: issues and concerns.
Cohen LG
J Assoc Pers Sev Handicaps; 1986; 11(3):188-95. PubMed ID: 11655848
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Death of an unborn child: jurisprudential inconsistencies in wrongful death, criminal homicide, and abortion cases.
Klasing MS
Pepperdine Law Rev; 1995; 22(3):933-79. PubMed ID: 11660413
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. The legal recognition of medical malpractice tort claims based upon theories of wrongful birth and wrongful life.
Mayo KL
North Carol Centr Law J; 1985; 15(2):274-94. PubMed ID: 11658795
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Medicolegal implications of constitutional status for the unborn: "ambulatory chalices" or "priorities and aspirations.
Tolton C
Univ Tor Fac Law Rev; 1988; 47(1):3-57. PubMed ID: 11655976
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Legal criteria for distinguishing between live and dead human foetuses and newborn children.
Bates P
Univ N S W Law J; 1983; 6(1):143-51. PubMed ID: 11649731
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Common law duties to unborn children.
Whitfield A
Med Law Rev; 1993 Jan; 1(1):28-52. PubMed ID: 11653233
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. The trend toward judicial recognition of wrongful life: a dissenting view.
Kennedy B
UCLA Law Rev; 1983 Dec; 31(2):473-501. PubMed ID: 11658675
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Prenatal diagnosis and selective abortion.
Lebacqz KA
Linacre Q; 1973 May; 40(2):109-27. PubMed ID: 11660959
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Fetal rights and maternal rights: is there a conflict?
Rogers S
Can J Women Law; 1986; 1(2):456-69. PubMed ID: 11651100
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Genetic medicine in the perspective of Orthodox halakhah.
Green RM
Judaism; 1985; 34(3):263-77. PubMed ID: 11655822
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. The impact of recombinant DNA technology on genetic screening.
Gauthier CC
Public Aff Q; 1989 Jan; 3(1):25-48. PubMed ID: 11651935
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Regulating IVF human embryo experimentation: the search for a legal basis.
Kasimba P
Aust Law J; 1988 Feb; 62(2):128-38. PubMed ID: 11659149
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. The new neonatal dilemma: live births from late abortions.
Rhoden NK
Georgetown Law J; 1984 Jun; 72(5):1451-509. PubMed ID: 11658578
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Birth technologies: prenatal diagnosis and abortion policy.
Brigham J; Rifkin J; Solt CG
Politics Life Sci; 1993 Feb; 12(1):31-44. PubMed ID: 11656399
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. The "new" genetics: emerging medicolegal issues in the prenatal issues in the prenatal diagnosis of hereditary disorders.
Milunsky A; Reilly P
Am J Law Med; 1975 Mar; 1(1):71-88. PubMed ID: 1234716
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
