These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

263 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11655828)

  • 1. Trimesters and technology: revamping Roe v. Wade.
    Rhoden NK
    Yale Law J; 1986 Mar; 95(4):639-97. PubMed ID: 11655828
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Enforcement of state abortion statutes after Roe: a state-by-state analysis.
    Linton PB
    Univ Detroit Law Rev; 1990; 67(2):157-259. PubMed ID: 11659261
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Technological advances and Roe v. Wade: the need to rethink abortion law.
    Martyn K
    UCLA Law Rev; 1982; 29(5-6):1194-215. PubMed ID: 11655743
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Roe v. Wade and the traditional legal standards concerning pregnancy.
    Hopkin WR
    Temple Law Q; 1974; 47(4):715-38. PubMed ID: 11664349
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Judicial decision making and biological fact: Roe v. Wade and the unresolved question of fetal viability.
    Blank RH
    West Polit Q; 1984 Dec; 37(4):584-602. PubMed ID: 11655744
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The viability of the trimester approach.
    Calder KA
    Univ Baltimore Law Rev; 1984; 13(2):322-45. PubMed ID: 11658808
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Killing "the handicapped" -- before and after birth.
    Field MA
    Harv Womens Law J; 1993; 16():79-138. PubMed ID: 11652872
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Abortion 1984: the controversy continues.
    Healey JM
    Conn Med; 1984 Apr; 48(4):269. PubMed ID: 11644128
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Roe! Doe! Where are you?: the effect of the Supreme Court's abortion decisions.
    Satris MJ
    Univ Calif Davis Law Rev; 1974; 7():432-56. PubMed ID: 11661108
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Why Roe v. Wade should be overruled.
    Loewy AH
    North Carol Law Rev; 1989 Apr; 67(4):939-48. PubMed ID: 11655982
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A decade of cementing the mosaic of Roe v. Wade: is the composite a message to leave abortion alone?
    Kudner KE
    Univ Toledo Law Rev; 1984; 15(2):681-753. PubMed ID: 11649780
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Roe v. Wade and Doe v. Bolton: the compelling state interest test in substantive due process.
    Gelinas A
    Wash Lee Law Rev; 1973; 30(3):628-46. PubMed ID: 11663508
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Prenatal caretaking: limits of state intervention with and without Roe.
    Rush SE
    Univ Fla Law Rev; 1987; 39(1):55-112. PubMed ID: 11658954
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Current technology affecting Supreme Court abortion jurisprudence.
    Buckley M
    NY Law Sch Law Rev; 1982; 27(4):1221-60. PubMed ID: 11651778
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. City of Akron v. Akron Center for Reproductive Health, Inc.: stare decisis prevails, but for how long?
    Prieto P
    Univ Miami Law Rev; 1984 Sep; 38(5):921-38. PubMed ID: 11655794
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania v. Casey: constitutional principles and political turbulence.
    Bigel AI
    Univ Dayton Law Rev; 1993; 18(3):733-62. PubMed ID: 11659777
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Roe v. Wade: its impact on rights of choice in human reproduction.
    Patton DE
    Columbia Human Rights Law Rev; 1973; 5(2):497-521. PubMed ID: 11663415
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Closing the circle of constitutional review from Griswold v. Connecticut to Roe v. Wade: an outline of a decision merely overruling Roe.
    Van Alstyne W
    Duke Law J; 1989 Dec; 1989(6):1677-88. PubMed ID: 11656009
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. On the legal status of the proposition that "life begins at conception.
    Rubenfeld J
    Stanford Law Rev; 1991 Feb; 43(3):599-635. PubMed ID: 11645689
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Woman, womb, and bodily integrity.
    Neff CL
    Yale J Law Fem; 1991; 3(2):327-53. PubMed ID: 11656226
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.