180 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11655848)
1. Selective abortion and the diagnosis of fetal damage: issues and concerns.
Cohen LG
J Assoc Pers Sev Handicaps; 1986; 11(3):188-95. PubMed ID: 11655848
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Fetal rights? It depends.
Doudera AE
Trial; 1982 Apr; 18(4):38-44, 74-76. PubMed ID: 11649512
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Unborn child abuse: contemplating legal solution.
Dorczak A
Can J Fam Law; 1991; 9(2):133-56. PubMed ID: 11656494
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. The fetus and the law--whose life is it anyway?
Gallagher J
Ms; 1984 Sep; 13(3):62, 64, 66+. PubMed ID: 11655606
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. The legal status of the unborn after Webster.
Parness JA
Dickinson Law Rev; 1990; 95(1):1-22. PubMed ID: 11659394
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Torts--wrongful death--recovery for wrongful death of a stillborn fetus examined.
Cherken HS
Villanova Law Rev; 1976 Oct; 21(5-6):994-1005. PubMed ID: 11664726
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. To be or not to be: protecting the unborn's potentiality of life.
Parness JA; Pritchard SK
Univ Cincinnati Law Rev; 1982; 51(2):257-98. PubMed ID: 11658559
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. The right to begin life with sound body and mind: fetal patients and conflicts with their mothers.
Dougherty CJ
Univ Detroit Law Rev; 1985; 63(1-2):89-117. PubMed ID: 11659281
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Current technology affecting Supreme Court abortion jurisprudence.
Buckley M
NY Law Sch Law Rev; 1982; 27(4):1221-60. PubMed ID: 11651778
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Injuries to unborn children.
Cane PF
Aust Law J; 1977 Oct; 51(10):704-20. PubMed ID: 11665004
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. The new neonatal dilemma: live births from late abortions.
Rhoden NK
Georgetown Law J; 1984 Jun; 72(5):1451-509. PubMed ID: 11658578
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Death of an unborn child: jurisprudential inconsistencies in wrongful death, criminal homicide, and abortion cases.
Klasing MS
Pepperdine Law Rev; 1995; 22(3):933-79. PubMed ID: 11660413
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Torts--wrongful death--a viable fetus is a "person" under the New Mexico wrongful death statute: Salazar v. St. Vincent Hospital.
Donahue SL
N M Law Rev; 1982; 12(2):843-59. PubMed ID: 11658657
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. The duty to prevent handicaps: laws promoting the prevention of handicaps to newborns.
Parness JA
West New Engl Law Rev; 1983; 5(3):431-64. PubMed ID: 11658603
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. The law of tortious prenatal death since Roe v. Wade.
Kader D
Miss Law Rev; 1980; 45(4):639-66. PubMed ID: 11658350
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Prenatal wrongful death.
Steinbock B
Bioethics; 1987 Oct; 1(4):301-20. PubMed ID: 11651905
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comment: wrongful conception and the right not to be harmed.
Feinberg J
Harv J Law Public Policy; 1985; 8(1):57-77. PubMed ID: 11655782
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Wrongful life, wrongful birth, and wrongful pregnancy: judicial divergence in the birth-related torts.
DeVries DL; Rifkin AM
Forum; 1985; 20(2):207-21. PubMed ID: 11658575
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Wrongful life and the counterfactual element in harming.
Feinberg J
Soc Philos Policy; 1986; 4(1):145-78. PubMed ID: 11658783
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Hummel v. Reiss: the New Jersey Supreme Court takes a step backward in its recognition of wrongful life.
Barrett TA
Rutgers Law Rev; 1993; 46(1):535-63. PubMed ID: 11652806
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
