These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

536 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11655854)

  • 1. Transition from fetus to infant: a problem for law and ethics.
    Jonsen AR
    Hastings Law J; 1986 May; 37(5):697-701. PubMed ID: 11655854
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Who counts?
    Smith DH
    J Relig Ethics; 1984; 12(2):240-55. PubMed ID: 11655717
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Abortion and the right to die: judicial imposition of a theory of life.
    Prygoski PJ
    Seton Hall Law Rev; 1992; 23(1):67-120. PubMed ID: 11656225
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Confronting objections to an anti-abortion amendment.
    Byrn RM
    America (NY); 1976 Jun; 134(24):529-34. PubMed ID: 11664690
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Abortion and human rights.
    Horan DJ; Gorby JD
    Hum Life Rev; 1976; 2(3):21-33. PubMed ID: 11663654
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Abortion and euthanasia: recent developments of the law.
    Horan DJ
    Forum; 1977; 12(4):960-79. PubMed ID: 11663978
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Rights discourse and neonatal euthanasia.
    Schneider CE
    Calif Law Rev; 1988 Jan; 76(1):151-76. PubMed ID: 11659061
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Abortion: a misplaced debate.
    Brockway AR
    Engage Soc Action; 1974 Feb; 2(2):33-47. PubMed ID: 11663497
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The right to life in law: the embryo and fetus, the body and soul, the family and society.
    Hicks SC
    Fla State Univ Law Rev; 1991; 19(3):805-50. PubMed ID: 11656190
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Sandra Day O'Connor and the justification of abortion.
    Werhane PH
    Theor Med; 1984 Oct; 5(3):359-63. PubMed ID: 11644178
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. How not to promote serious deliberation about abortion.
    McConnell MW
    Univ Chic Law Rev; 1991; 58(3):1181-202. PubMed ID: 11656153
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Law, bioethics and biomedicine--towards a healthier interaction.
    Keyserlingk EW
    McGill Law J; 1981; 26(4):1020-35. PubMed ID: 11650587
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The decline of personhood.
    Wauck J
    Hum Life Rev; 1988; 14(1):51-70. PubMed ID: 11655918
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A decision-theoretic reconstruction of Roe v. Wade.
    Lockhart T
    Public Aff Q; 1991 Jul; 5(3):243-58. PubMed ID: 11656064
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Why abortion is immoral.
    Marquis D
    J Philos; 1989 Apr; 86(4):183-202. PubMed ID: 11782094
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The constitutionality of the Human Life Bill.
    Ruf BA
    Wash Univ Law Q; 1983; 61(1):219-52. PubMed ID: 11655816
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. What Is a Person? edited by Michael F. Goodman, and Moral Personhood: An Essay in the Philosophy of Moral Psychology by G.E. Scott.
    Elliot R
    Bioethics; 1992 Jan; 6(1):41-60. PubMed ID: 11651507
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Abortion: for whose sake?
    Walker De
    Hastings Cent Rep; 1976 Aug; 6(4):4+. PubMed ID: 11643568
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The right over one's own body: its scope and limits in comparative law.
    Meulders-Klein MT
    Boston College Int Comp Law Rev; 1983; 6(1):29-79. PubMed ID: 11655891
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The new neonatal dilemma: live births from late abortions.
    Rhoden NK
    Georgetown Law J; 1984 Jun; 72(5):1451-509. PubMed ID: 11658578
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 27.