These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

179 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11655858)

  • 1. Baby Jane Doe: stating a cause of action against the officious intermeddler.
    Vitiello M
    Hastings Law J; 1986 May; 37(5):863-908. PubMed ID: 11655858
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Baby Doe cases: compromise and moral dilemma.
    Haddon PA
    Emory Law J; 1985; 34(3-4):545-615. PubMed ID: 11658790
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Baby Jane.
    Cohen R
    Washington Post; 1983 Nov; ():B1. PubMed ID: 11646270
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Meese approved intervention in baby case.
    Barringer F
    Washington Post; 1983 Nov; ():A16. PubMed ID: 11646345
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Life and death decisions in the nursery: standards and procedures for withholding lifesaving treatment from infants.
    Smith SR
    NY Law Sch Law Rev; 1982; 27(4):1125-86. PubMed ID: 11651775
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Infant Doe and Baby Jane Doe: medical treatment of the handicapped newborn.
    Horan DJ; Balch BJ
    Linacre Q; 1985 Feb; 52(1):45-76. PubMed ID: 11651855
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The survival of Baby Doe.
    Lancet; 1984 Jan; 1(8370):215. PubMed ID: 11644275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Baby Jane Doe and other related matters.
    Ment Disabil Law Rep; 1983; 7(6):446-8. PubMed ID: 11651726
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Refusal of lifesaving treatment for minors.
    Annas GJ
    J Fam Law; 1984-1985; 23(2):217-40. PubMed ID: 11651846
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Law, medicine, and morality: the cases of Infant Doe and Pamela Hamilton.
    Klinefelter D
    J Law Relig; 1984; 2(2):413-27. PubMed ID: 11651848
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. U.S. lawyer concedes point in 'Doe' case.
    Barringer F
    Washington Post; 1983 Dec; ():A8. PubMed ID: 11646341
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The future of Baby Doe.
    Singer P; Kuhse H
    New York Rev Books; 1984 Mar; 31(3):17-22. PubMed ID: 11658414
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Judge rejects U.S. role in 'Baby Doe' case.
    Barringer F
    Washington Post; 1983 Nov; ():A33. PubMed ID: 11646343
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. U.S. seeks records of 'Baby Jane Doe'.
    Barringer F
    Washington Post; 1983 Nov; ():A1, A15. PubMed ID: 11646368
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Decision to pursue Baby Doe case born in confusion at HHS.
    Barringer F
    Washington Post; 1983 Dec; ():A19. PubMed ID: 11646342
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. 'Baby Jane' ruling appealed by Justice.
    Barringer F
    Washington Post; 1983 Nov; ():A5. PubMed ID: 11646367
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Beyond state intervention in the family: for Baby Jane Doe.
    Minow M
    Univ Mich J Law Reform; 1985; 18(4):933-1014. PubMed ID: 11655183
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. "New" rights for handicapped newborns: Baby Doe and beyond.
    Phillips CA
    Calif West Law Rev; 1985; 22(1):127-58. PubMed ID: 11658804
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Weber v. Stony Brook Hospital.
    New York. Court of Appeals
    North East Rep Second Ser; 1983 Oct; 456():1186-8. PubMed ID: 12041207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Discrimination and Baby Jane.
    Will GF
    Washington Post; 1983 Dec; ():A23. PubMed ID: 11646274
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.