These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
189 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11655874)
1. Thornburgh v. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists: distinguishing abortion regulation from attempted intimidation. Erato LD Loyola Law Rev; 1987; 33(2):498-516. PubMed ID: 11655874 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Justices uphold abortion rights by narrow vote. Taylor S N Y Times Web; 1986 Jun; ():A1, B10-11. PubMed ID: 11647367 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Privacy II: state attempts to regulate abortion. Prall S Annu Surv Am Law; 1988; 1(2):385-427. PubMed ID: 11652657 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. From arguments to Supreme Court opinions in Planned Parenthood v. Casey. Kassop N PS (Wash DC); 1993 Mar; 26(1):53-8. PubMed ID: 12085874 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. A thorn in the side of privacy: the need for reassessment of the constitutional right to abortion. Kunz KA Marquette Law Rev; 1987; 70(3):534-71. PubMed ID: 11655884 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. The Supreme Court on abortion funding: the second time around. Horan DJ; Marzen TJ St Louis Univ Law J; 1981; 25(2):411-27. PubMed ID: 11655812 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Abortion is affirmed, but in a lower voice. Taylor S N Y Times Web; 1986 Jun; ():E1. PubMed ID: 11647366 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Webster, privacy, and RU486. Haas EM J Contemp Health Law Policy; 1990; 6():277-96. PubMed ID: 11645679 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. The center holds! Dworkin R New York Rev Books; 1992 Aug; 39(14):29-33. PubMed ID: 11656267 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. The constitutionality of the Freedom of Choice Act of 1993. Axel DA Hastings Law J; 1994; 45(3):641-65. PubMed ID: 11656418 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. The right of privacy and restraints on abortion under the "undue burden" test: a jurisprudential comparison of Planned Parenthood v. Casey with European practice and Italian law. Ross CS Indiana Int Comp Law Rev; 1993; 3():199-231. PubMed ID: 12091926 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. The Human Life Federalism Amendment: an assessment. Caron WR Cathol Lawyer; 1982; 27(2):87-111. PubMed ID: 11655614 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania v. Casey: constitutional principles and political turbulence. Bigel AI Univ Dayton Law Rev; 1993; 18(3):733-62. PubMed ID: 11659777 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Roe to Casey: a survey of abortion law. Pirner RK; Williams LB Washburn Law J; 1993; 32(2):166-89. PubMed ID: 11659798 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Webster v. Reproductive Health Services: a path to constitutional equalibrium. Chopko ME Campbell Law Rev; 1990; 12(2):181-220. PubMed ID: 11656527 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. The invalidity of Canada's abortion law--section 251 of the Criminal Code. Picher PC Crim Rep Can New Ser; 1974; 24():1-31. PubMed ID: 11663529 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. The Pennsylvania abortion case. Benshoof J Touro Law Rev; 1993; 9(2):217-49. PubMed ID: 11656382 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Webster and the future of substantive due process. Bopp J; Coleson RE Duquesne Law Rev; 1990; 28(2):271-94. PubMed ID: 11656037 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Oh my God, I'm pregnant. Minter CV Ohio North Univ Law Rev; 1973; 1(1):119-29. PubMed ID: 11663469 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]