These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

189 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11655874)

  • 21. Testimony opposing "Freedom of Choice Act.
    Alvare H;
    Origins; 1992 Apr; 21(43):692-6. PubMed ID: 11656134
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Abortion rights under state constitutions: fighting the abortion war in the state courts.
    Chaput KA
    Oregon Law Rev; 1991; 70(3):593-628. PubMed ID: 11659531
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The law of choice and choice of law: abortion, the right to travel, and extraterritorial regulation in American federalism.
    Kreimer SF
    N Y Univ Law Rev; 1992 Jun; 67(3):451-519. PubMed ID: 11656241
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Abortion regulation: the circumscription of state intervention by the doctrine of informed consent.
    Abbot L
    Georgia Law Rev; 1981; 15(3):681-713. PubMed ID: 11658321
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Rethinking Roe v. Wade.
    Wardle LD
    Brigh Young Univ Law Rev; 1985; 1985(2):231-64. PubMed ID: 11655792
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The right to Medicaid payment for abortion.
    Butler PA
    Hastings Law J; 1977 Mar; 28(4):931-77. PubMed ID: 11663756
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Constitutional law--substantive due process--abortion--reasonable statutory recordkeeping and reporting requirements upheld.
    Brigh Young Univ Law Rev; 1976; 1976(4):977-99. PubMed ID: 11664779
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The erosion of Roe v. Wade; do minors have any rights?
    Sourial WH
    Whittier Law Rev; 1992; 13(1):285-332. PubMed ID: 11656215
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Abortion regulation: Louisiana's abortive attempt.
    Vance RP
    LA Law Rev; 1974; 34(3):676-85. PubMed ID: 11663504
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Abortion, absolutism, and compromise.
    Carter SL
    Yale Law J; 1991 Jun; 100(8):2747-66. PubMed ID: 11656152
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Is the Court rethinking abortion?
    Marcus R; Kamen A
    Washington Post; 1985 May; ():C5. PubMed ID: 11647357
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Abortion, precedent, and the Constitution: a comment on Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania v. Casey.
    Maltz EM
    Notre Dame Law Rev; 1992; 68(1):11-32. PubMed ID: 11656531
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Constitutional law--abortion--parental and spousal consent requirements--right to privacy.
    Long SL; Ravenscraft P
    Akron Law Rev; 1976; 10(2):367-82. PubMed ID: 11664733
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The battle over abortion.
    Salholz E
    Newsweek; 1989 May; 113(18):28-32, 34-36, 38. PubMed ID: 11659104
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Abortion rights of young women: the Supreme Court attacks the most vulnerable.
    Heller S
    Washburn Law J; 1990; 30(1):15-28. PubMed ID: 11659579
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The new pro-life legislation: patterns and recommendations.
    Witherspoon JP
    St Marys Law J; 1976; 7(4):637-97. PubMed ID: 11664635
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Why Roe v. Wade should be overruled.
    Loewy AH
    North Carol Law Rev; 1989 Apr; 67(4):939-48. PubMed ID: 11655982
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. American College of Obstetricians v. Thornburgh.
    U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit
    Fed Report; 1984 May; 737():283-319. PubMed ID: 11648491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. State limitations upon the availability and accessibility of abortions after Wade and Bolton.
    Finn J
    Univ Kans Law Rev; 1976; 25(1):87-107. PubMed ID: 11663734
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Right of privacy--mandatory hospitalization for all second trimester abortions invalidated as not being reasonably related to maternal health--City of Akron v. Akron Center for Reproductive Health, 103 S.Ct. 2481 (1983).
    Lim DG
    Santa Clara Law Rev; 1984; 24(3):789-801. PubMed ID: 11655804
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.