These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

169 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11655881)

  • 1. The abortion of a foetus incapable of being born alive.
    Aust Law J; 1987 Jul; 61(7):326-8. PubMed ID: 11655881
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Protecting the life of the unborn child.
    Grubb A; Pearl D
    Law Q Rev; 1987 Jul; 103():340-6. PubMed ID: 11658992
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. C v. S.
    Great Britain. Court of Appeal, Civil Division (23, 24, 25 Feb 1987) [and] Queen's Bench Division (17, 18, 20, 21, 23 Feb 1987)
    All Engl Law Rep; 1987 Feb 23-25 (date of decision); [1987] 1():1230-44. PubMed ID: 11648562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The inadequacies of Australian abortion law.
    Cica N
    Aust J Fam Law; 1991 Mar; 5(1):37-68. PubMed ID: 11656112
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A thorn in the side of privacy: the need for reassessment of the constitutional right to abortion.
    Kunz KA
    Marquette Law Rev; 1987; 70(3):534-71. PubMed ID: 11655884
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The dilemma of the Webster decision: deconstitutionalizing the trimester system.
    Kindregan CP
    Report Hum Reprod Law; 1990; 25-26():276-92. PubMed ID: 11686167
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The new pro-life legislation: patterns and recommendations.
    Witherspoon JP
    St Marys Law J; 1976; 7(4):637-97. PubMed ID: 11664635
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Sui generis: the legal nature of the foetus in Canada.
    McConnell ML
    Can Bar Rev; 1991; 70():548-56. PubMed ID: 11656180
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. S.J. Res. 110: Human Life Federalism Amendment.
    Hatch OG
    Congr Rec (Dly Ed); 1981 Sep; 127(131):S10194-8. PubMed ID: 11658572
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Planned Parenthood of Central Missouri v. Danforth. 31 Jan 1975.
    U.S. District Court, E.D. Missouri, E.D
    Fed Suppl; 1975; 392():1362-79. PubMed ID: 11646047
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Beyond the Roe debate: judicial experience with the 1980's "reasonableness" test.
    Farber DA; Nowak JE
    Va Law Rev; 1990 Apr; 76(3):519-38. PubMed ID: 11659370
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Demise of the trimester standard? City of Akron v. Akron Center for Reproductive Health, Inc.
    Curry RE
    J Fam Law; 1984-1985; 23(2):267-86. PubMed ID: 11651847
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. High Court, 5-4, affirms right to abortion but allows most of Pennsylvania's limits.
    Greenhouse L
    N Y Times Web; 1992 Jun; ():A1, A15-17. PubMed ID: 11647923
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The viability of the trimester approach.
    Calder KA
    Univ Baltimore Law Rev; 1984; 13(2):322-45. PubMed ID: 11658808
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Doe v. Zimmerman. 3 Dec 1975.
    U.S. District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania
    Fed Suppl; 1975; 405():534-41. PubMed ID: 11646051
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The trimester approach: how long can the legal fiction last?
    Casurella JG; Schrock CT
    Mercer Law Rev; 1984; 35(4):891-913. PubMed ID: 11658750
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Rationalizing the abortion debate: legal rhetoric and the abortion controversy.
    Chemerinsky E
    Buffalo Law Rev; 1982; 31(1):107-64. PubMed ID: 11655711
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Planned Parenthood v. Casey: the current state of abortion law.
    Berlin SI
    Second Opin; 1993 Jan; 18(3):104-9. PubMed ID: 11645221
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania v. Casey: the reaffirmation of Roe or the beginning of the end?
    Henry KS
    Univ Louisv J Fam Law; 1993-1994 Winter; 32(1):93-113. PubMed ID: 11660011
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Workability of the undue burden test.
    Schneider EA
    Temple Law Rev; 1993; 66(3):1003-37. PubMed ID: 11659882
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.