These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

580 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11655884)

  • 41. Choice rights and abortion: the begetting choice right and state obstacles to choice in light of artificial womb technology.
    Goldstein MA
    South Calif Law Rev; 1978 Jul; 51(5):877-921. PubMed ID: 11663901
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania v. Casey: constitutional principles and political turbulence.
    Bigel AI
    Univ Dayton Law Rev; 1993; 18(3):733-62. PubMed ID: 11659777
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Roe v. Wade: its impact on rights of choice in human reproduction.
    Patton DE
    Columbia Human Rights Law Rev; 1973; 5(2):497-521. PubMed ID: 11663415
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Enforcement of state abortion statutes after Roe: a state-by-state analysis.
    Linton PB
    Univ Detroit Law Rev; 1990; 67(2):157-259. PubMed ID: 11659261
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Court gets stark arguments on abortion.
    Greenhouse L
    N Y Times Web; 1992 Apr; ():A1, B10-11. PubMed ID: 11646254
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. How rights are infringed: the role of undue burden analysis in constitutional doctrine.
    Brownstein A
    Hastings Law J; 1994 Apr; 45(4):867-959. PubMed ID: 11656422
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. The new pro-life legislation: patterns and recommendations.
    Witherspoon JP
    St Marys Law J; 1976; 7(4):637-97. PubMed ID: 11664635
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Constitutional law--right to privacy--municipal roadblock to abortion denounced--City of Akron v. Akron Center for Reproductive Health, Inc., 103 S.Ct. 2481(1983).
    Crusius CJ
    Seton Hall Law Rev; 1984; 14(3):658-82. PubMed ID: 11658811
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Planned Parenthood v. Casey: the death of repose in reproductive decisionmaking.
    Nivala J
    Const Law J; 1993; 4(1):47-95. PubMed ID: 12083095
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Abortion and liberalism: a comparison between the abortion decisions of the Supreme Court of the United States and the Constitutional Court of West Germany.
    Morris DG
    Hastings Int Comp Law Rev; 1988; 11(2):159-245. PubMed ID: 11655935
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Abortion rights in America.
    Bullock JR
    Brigh Young Univ Law Rev; 1994; 1994(1):63-94. PubMed ID: 11656488
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Webster v. Reproductive Health Services: devaluing the right to choose.
    Binion G
    Women Polit; 1991; 11(2):41-60. PubMed ID: 11656100
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Emancipation as freedom in Roe v. Wade.
    Bezanson RP
    Dickinson Law Rev; 1993; 97(3):485-512. PubMed ID: 11656343
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. The constitutional morality of abortion.
    Brownstein A; Dau P
    Boston Coll Law Rev; 1992 Jul; 33(4):689-761. PubMed ID: 11656217
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Roe v. Wade: a retrospective look at a judicial oxymoron.
    Coleman JJ
    St Louis Univ Law J; 1984 Dec; 29(7):7-44. PubMed ID: 11655813
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Abortion rights under state constitutions: fighting the abortion war in the state courts.
    Chaput KA
    Oregon Law Rev; 1991; 70(3):593-628. PubMed ID: 11659531
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Legal abortion under fierce attack 15 years after Roe v. Wade ruling.
    Lewin T
    N Y Times Web; 1988 May; ():A20. PubMed ID: 11647387
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Thornburgh v. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists: distinguishing abortion regulation from attempted intimidation.
    Erato LD
    Loyola Law Rev; 1987; 33(2):498-516. PubMed ID: 11655874
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Massachusetts parental/judicial consent law for minors' abortions: perspectives on the past, present, and future.
    Joseph MA
    New Engl Law Rev; 1992; 26(3):1051-99. PubMed ID: 11659665
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. A lesson in judicial abdication: Roe v. Arizona Board of Regents and the right of privacy.
    Sirkis JE
    Ariz State Law J; 1976; 1976(3):499-524. PubMed ID: 11663820
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 29.