These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

322 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11655926)

  • 1. The Title X family planning gag rule: can the government buy up constitutional rights?
    Chervin CI
    Stanford Law Rev; 1989 Jan; 41(2):401-34. PubMed ID: 11655926
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Government funding in Title X projects: circumscribing the constitutional rights of the indigent: Rust v. Sullivan.
    Maher L
    Calif West Law Rev; 1992; 29(1):143-82. PubMed ID: 11656260
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Latest administration tactic makes abortion fight a free speech issue.
    Lewin T
    N Y Times Web; 1988 Feb; ():E7. PubMed ID: 11647385
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Five justices uphold U.S. rule curbing abortion advice Some clinics to still advise but forgo aid.
    Greenhouse L; Brozan N
    N Y Times Web; 1991 May; ():A1, A18. PubMed ID: 11647436
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. U.S. suspends plan to cut off funds for abortion ties.
    Pear R
    N Y Times Web; 1988 Mar; ():A1, B8. PubMed ID: 11646665
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Rust v. Sullivan.
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Wests Supreme Court Report; 1991 May; 111():1759-89. PubMed ID: 12041295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Rust v. Sullivan: triumph of the right over reason.
    Call EC
    J Fam Law; 1992-1993 Winter; 31(1):123-42. PubMed ID: 11656449
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The Title X family planning subsidies: the government's role in moral issues.
    Reitler EG
    Harvard J Legis; 1990; 27(2):453-95. PubMed ID: 11656070
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Massachusetts v. Secretary of Health and Human Services.
    U.S. Court of Appeals, First Circuit
    Fed Report; 1990 Mar; 899():53-79. PubMed ID: 11648391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Official tells of U.S. plan to discourage abortions.
    Hilts PJ
    N Y Times Web; 1991 Mar; ():A22. PubMed ID: 11647434
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. U.S. issues limits on abortion aid by family clinics.
    Pear R
    N Y Times Web; 1987 Aug; ():1, 26. PubMed ID: 11647377
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Souter questions a curb on doctors: Justices skeptical of federal bar to advice on abortion.
    Greenhouse L
    N Y Times Web; 1990 Oct; ():A1, A22. PubMed ID: 11647430
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The discourse ethics alternative to Rust v. Sullivan.
    Leedes GC
    Univ Richmond Law Rev; 1991; 26(1):87-143. PubMed ID: 11659547
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Family-planning clinics face dilemma over their mission.
    Lewin T
    N Y Times Web; 1991 Jun; ():A1, A16. PubMed ID: 11647443
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. New York v. Sullivan.
    U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
    Fed Report; 1989 Nov; 889():401-18. PubMed ID: 11648392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The "gag rule" revisited: physicians as abortion gatekeepers.
    Bloche MG
    Law Med Health Care; 1992; 20(4):392-402. PubMed ID: 11651561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The impact of public abortion funding decisions on indigent women: a proposal to reform state statutory and constitutional abortion funding provisions.
    Corns CA
    Univ Mich J Law Reform; 1991; 24(2):371-403. PubMed ID: 11656224
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. U.S. abortion rule is upheld by judge.
    Lewin T
    N Y Times Web; 1988 Jul; ():46. PubMed ID: 11647389
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Toward a First Amendment theory of doctor-patient discourse and the right to receive unbiased medical advice.
    Berg P
    Boston Univ Law Rev; 1994 Mar; 74(2):201-66. PubMed ID: 11659979
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Abortion compromise -- inevitable and impossible.
    Law SA
    Univ Ill Law Rev; 1992; 25(4):921-41. PubMed ID: 11656296
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.