These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
883 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11655929)
1. The future of abortion. McDaniel A Newsweek; 1989 Jul; 114(3):14-21, 24-27. PubMed ID: 11655929 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Mediating the polar extremes: a guide to post-Webster abortion policy. Wilkins RG; Sherlock R; Clark S Brigh Young Univ Law Rev; 1991; 1991(1):403-87. PubMed ID: 11656173 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Abortion choice and the law in Vermont: a recent study. Olmstead FH Vt Law Rev; 1982; 7(2):281-313. PubMed ID: 11655820 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Roe to Casey: a survey of abortion law. Pirner RK; Williams LB Washburn Law J; 1993; 32(2):166-89. PubMed ID: 11659798 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Missouri loses latest round in battle over permissible abortion regulations. Baldwin ML UMKC Law Rev; 1982; 50(3):320-39. PubMed ID: 11658633 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. A decade of cementing the mosaic of Roe v. Wade: is the composite a message to leave abortion alone? Kudner KE Univ Toledo Law Rev; 1984; 15(2):681-753. PubMed ID: 11649780 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Enforcement of state abortion statutes after Roe: a state-by-state analysis. Linton PB Univ Detroit Law Rev; 1990; 67(2):157-259. PubMed ID: 11659261 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Tribe's judicious feminism -- Abortion: The Clash of Absolutes. Allen AL Stanford Law Rev; 1991 Nov; 44(1):179-203. PubMed ID: 11659573 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Rationalizing the abortion debate: legal rhetoric and the abortion controversy. Chemerinsky E Buffalo Law Rev; 1982; 31(1):107-64. PubMed ID: 11655711 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Privacy II: state attempts to regulate abortion. Prall S Annu Surv Am Law; 1988; 1(2):385-427. PubMed ID: 11652657 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Beyond the Roe debate: judicial experience with the 1980's "reasonableness" test. Farber DA; Nowak JE Va Law Rev; 1990 Apr; 76(3):519-38. PubMed ID: 11659370 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Massachusetts parental/judicial consent law for minors' abortions: perspectives on the past, present, and future. Joseph MA New Engl Law Rev; 1992; 26(3):1051-99. PubMed ID: 11659665 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. How not to promote serious deliberation about abortion. McConnell MW Univ Chic Law Rev; 1991; 58(3):1181-202. PubMed ID: 11656153 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. The viability of the trimester approach. Calder KA Univ Baltimore Law Rev; 1984; 13(2):322-45. PubMed ID: 11658808 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. The erosion of Roe v. Wade; do minors have any rights? Sourial WH Whittier Law Rev; 1992; 13(1):285-332. PubMed ID: 11656215 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Abortion as a vice crime: a "what if" story. Kaplan J Law Contemp Probl; 1988; 51(1):151-79. PubMed ID: 11650281 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Abortions for minors after Bellotti II: an analysis of state law and a proposal. Lozano GD St Marys Law J; 1980; 11(4):946-97. PubMed ID: 11658462 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Abortion -- impact on public health. Malkasian GD State Health Legis Rep; 1989 Dec; 17(4):1-8. PubMed ID: 11655953 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Easing restrictions on minors' abortion rights. O'Keeffe J; Jones JM Issues Sci Technol; 1990; 7(4):74-80. PubMed ID: 11659333 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]