888 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11655929)
21. Reproduction and the law.
Erickson NS
Med Trial Tech Q; 1985; 32(2):165-74. PubMed ID: 11649200
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. The trimester approach: how long can the legal fiction last?
Casurella JG; Schrock CT
Mercer Law Rev; 1984; 35(4):891-913. PubMed ID: 11658750
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Abortion, absolutism, and compromise.
Carter SL
Yale Law J; 1991 Jun; 100(8):2747-66. PubMed ID: 11656152
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. Parents' rights vs. minors' rights regarding the provision of contraceptives to teenagers.
Wardle LD
Neb Law Rev; 1989; 68(1-2):216-60. PubMed ID: 11659270
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Resolving the abortion debate: compromise legislation, an analysis of the abortion policies of the United States, France and Germany.
Hertberg BL
Suffolk Transnatl Law R; 1993; 16(2):513-70. PubMed ID: 11659765
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Abortion and the consideration of fundamental, irreconcilable interests.
Jones CJ
Syracuse Law Rev; 1982; 33(2):565-613. PubMed ID: 11658668
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Abortion rights under state constitutions: fighting the abortion war in the state courts.
Chaput KA
Oregon Law Rev; 1991; 70(3):593-628. PubMed ID: 11659531
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Judicial restraint and the non-decision in Webster v. Reproductive Health Services.
Crain CA
Harv J Law Public Policy; 1990; 13(1):263-318. PubMed ID: 11649286
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Parental involvement in adolescent abortion decisions: a legal and psychological critique.
Embree MG; Dobson TA
Law Inequal; 1991 Dec; 10(1):53-79. PubMed ID: 11659634
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. A thorn in the side of privacy: the need for reassessment of the constitutional right to abortion.
Kunz KA
Marquette Law Rev; 1987; 70(3):534-71. PubMed ID: 11655884
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Minors' rights to confidential contraceptive services: the limits of state power.
Paul EW; Klassel D
Womens Rights Law Report; 1987; 10(1):45-63. PubMed ID: 11658948
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Parental notification and public policy.
Diamond EF
St Louis Univ Public Law Rev; 1993; 13(1):381-90. PubMed ID: 11656615
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Abortion: a new round.
Greenhouse L
N Y Times Web; 1989 Nov; ():A1, A24. PubMed ID: 11647875
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. The Webster amicus curiae briefs: perspectives on the abortion controversy and the role of the Supreme Court -- amici for appellants.
Blaustein AP
Am J Law Med; 1989; 15(2-3):204-33. PubMed ID: 11644397
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Informed consent to abortion: a refinement.
Jipping TL
Case West Reserve Law Rev; 1987-1988 Winter; 38(3):329-86. PubMed ID: 11659038
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Abortion rights of young women: the Supreme Court attacks the most vulnerable.
Heller S
Washburn Law J; 1990; 30(1):15-28. PubMed ID: 11659579
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. The judicial portrayal of the physician in abortion and sterilization decisions: the use and abuse of medical discretion.
Asaro A
Harv Womens Law J; 1983; 6(1):51-102. PubMed ID: 11658431
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. The Supreme Court on abortion funding: the second time around.
Horan DJ; Marzen TJ
St Louis Univ Law J; 1981; 25(2):411-27. PubMed ID: 11655812
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. When is a pregnant minor mature? When is an abortion in her best interests? The Ohio Supreme Court applies Ohio's Abortion Parental Notification Law: In re Jane Doe 1.
Stuhlbarg SF
Univ Cincinnati Law Rev; 1992; 60(3):907-61. PubMed ID: 11651633
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. The limits of judicial intervention in abortion politics.
Tatalovich R; Daynes BW
Christ Century; 1982 Jan 6-13; 99(1):16-20. PubMed ID: 11655445
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
