These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
743 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11655935)
1. Abortion and liberalism: a comparison between the abortion decisions of the Supreme Court of the United States and the Constitutional Court of West Germany. Morris DG Hastings Int Comp Law Rev; 1988; 11(2):159-245. PubMed ID: 11655935 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Canada's Roe: the Canadian abortion decision and its implications for American constitutional law and theory. Conkle DO Const Comment; 1989; 6(2):299-318. PubMed ID: 11655992 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Casey in the mirror: abortion, abuse and the right to protection in the United States and Germany. Neuman GL Am J Comp Law; 1995; 43(2):273-314. PubMed ID: 11656594 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Abortion and the right of privacy. Ortega ML Philipp Law J; 1973; 48(4-5):652-95. PubMed ID: 11663743 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. A beau mentir qui vient de loin: the 1988 Canadian abortion decision in comparative perspective. Glendon MA Northwest Univ Law Rev; 1989; 83(3):569-91. PubMed ID: 11655964 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Is West Germany's 1975 abortion decision a solution to the American abortion debate?: a critique of Mary Ann Glendon and Donald Kommers. Miedel F Rev Law Soc Change; 1993-1994; 20(3):471-515. PubMed ID: 11656404 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Unenumerated rights: whether and how Roe should be overruled. Dworkin R Univ Chic Law Rev; 1992; 59(1):381-432. PubMed ID: 11656301 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Roe v. Wade: its impact on rights of choice in human reproduction. Patton DE Columbia Human Rights Law Rev; 1973; 5(2):497-521. PubMed ID: 11663415 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Moral sentiment in judicial opinions on abortion. Moore EN Santa Clara Lawyer; 1975; 15(3):591-634. PubMed ID: 11663584 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Roe v. Wade: a retrospective look at a judicial oxymoron. Coleman JJ St Louis Univ Law J; 1984 Dec; 29(7):7-44. PubMed ID: 11655813 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Abortion and Constitution: United States and West Germany. Kommers DP Am J Comp Law; 1977; 25(2):255-85. PubMed ID: 11663731 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Planned Parenthood v. Casey: the flight from reason in the Supreme Court. Linton PB St Louis Univ Public Law Rev; 1993; 13(1):15-137. PubMed ID: 11656611 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Feminist litigation: an oxymoron? -- a study of the briefs filed in William L. Webster v. Reproductive Health Services. Colker R Harv Womens Law J; 1990; 13():137-88. PubMed ID: 11656053 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. "Even by commonsense morality": Morgentaler, Borowski, and the Constitution of Canada. McConnell ML Can Bar Rev; 1989 Mar; 68(1):765-96. PubMed ID: 11656020 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. A thorn in the side of privacy: the need for reassessment of the constitutional right to abortion. Kunz KA Marquette Law Rev; 1987; 70(3):534-71. PubMed ID: 11655884 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. The Supreme Court, the "facts of life" and "the thoughtful part of the nation. Destro RA Hum Life Rev; 1994; 20(3):28-48. PubMed ID: 11656359 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Court-ordered cesareans: can a pregnant woman refuse? Leavine BA Houst Law Rev; 1992; 29(1):185-218. PubMed ID: 11656666 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Abortion and a nation at war. First Things; 1992 Oct; 26():9-13. PubMed ID: 11659506 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. The Morgentaler judgment: constitutional rights, legislative intention, and institutional design. Weinrib LE Univ Tor Law J; 1992; 42(1):22-76. PubMed ID: 11656266 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]