292 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11655964)
1. A beau mentir qui vient de loin: the 1988 Canadian abortion decision in comparative perspective.
Glendon MA
Northwest Univ Law Rev; 1989; 83(3):569-91. PubMed ID: 11655964
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. "Even by commonsense morality": Morgentaler, Borowski, and the Constitution of Canada.
McConnell ML
Can Bar Rev; 1989 Mar; 68(1):765-96. PubMed ID: 11656020
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Canada's Roe: the Canadian abortion decision and its implications for American constitutional law and theory.
Conkle DO
Const Comment; 1989; 6(2):299-318. PubMed ID: 11655992
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. The Morgentaler decision: Parliament's options.
Hovius B
Can Fam Law Q; 1988; 3():137-65. PubMed ID: 11659378
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Feminist litigation: an oxymoron? -- a study of the briefs filed in William L. Webster v. Reproductive Health Services.
Colker R
Harv Womens Law J; 1990; 13():137-88. PubMed ID: 11656053
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Abortion and liberalism: a comparison between the abortion decisions of the Supreme Court of the United States and the Constitutional Court of West Germany.
Morris DG
Hastings Int Comp Law Rev; 1988; 11(2):159-245. PubMed ID: 11655935
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Judicial review and abortion in Canada: lessons for the United States in the wake of Webster v. Reproductive Health Services.
Beschle DL
Univ Colo Law Rev; 1990; 61(3):537-65. PubMed ID: 11656072
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Abortion and section 7 of the Charter: proposing a constitutionally valid foetal protection law.
McCourt KM; Love DJ
Manit Law J; 1989; 18(3):365-94. PubMed ID: 11656021
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Abortion and the right of privacy.
Ortega ML
Philipp Law J; 1973; 48(4-5):652-95. PubMed ID: 11663743
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Casey in the mirror: abortion, abuse and the right to protection in the United States and Germany.
Neuman GL
Am J Comp Law; 1995; 43(2):273-314. PubMed ID: 11656594
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Relationship, particularity, and change: reflections on R. v. Morgentaler and feminist approaches to liberty.
Lessard H
McGill Law J; 1991 Apr; 36(2):263-307. PubMed ID: 11659529
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. The politics of abortion.
Gearty C
J Law Soc; 1992; 19(4):441-53. PubMed ID: 11656230
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. The dilemma of the Webster decision: deconstitutionalizing the trimester system.
Kindregan CP
Report Hum Reprod Law; 1990; 25-26():276-92. PubMed ID: 11686167
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Liberty, abortion, and constitutional review in Canada.
Marshall G
Public Law; 1988; ():199-211. PubMed ID: 11655934
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Abortion and the freedom to travel in the European Economic Community: a perspective on Attorney General v. X.
Stoffregen SS
New Engl Law Rev; 1993; 28(2):543-76. PubMed ID: 11656448
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Morgentaler and American theories of judicial review: the Roe v. Wade debate in Canadian disguise?
Crann GP
Univ Tor Fac Law Rev; 1989; 47(2):499-525. PubMed ID: 11652618
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Abortion debate revived in Canada.
Burns JF
N Y Times Web; 1988 Feb; ():6. PubMed ID: 11647384
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Planned Parenthood v. Casey: the flight from reason in the Supreme Court.
Linton PB
St Louis Univ Public Law Rev; 1993; 13(1):15-137. PubMed ID: 11656611
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Security of the person, equality and abortion in Canada.
Mathewson GC
Univ Chic Leg Forum; 1989; 1989():251-80. PubMed ID: 11656040
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Forced obstetrical intervention: a charter analysis.
Grant I
Univ Tor Law J; 1989; 39(3):217-57. PubMed ID: 11656008
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
