232 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11655982)
1. Why Roe v. Wade should be overruled.
Loewy AH
North Carol Law Rev; 1989 Apr; 67(4):939-48. PubMed ID: 11655982
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Revisiting Roe v. Wade: substance and process in the abortion debate.
Farrell MG
Indiana Law J; 1993; 68(2):269-362. PubMed ID: 11656341
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Judicial supremacy, right-to-life and the abortion decision.
Lindholm LM
Public Aff Q; 1988 Apr; 2(2):1-20. PubMed ID: 11651912
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. A decision-theoretic reconstruction of Roe v. Wade.
Lockhart T
Public Aff Q; 1991 Jul; 5(3):243-58. PubMed ID: 11656064
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Trimesters and technology: revamping Roe v. Wade.
Rhoden NK
Yale Law J; 1986 Mar; 95(4):639-97. PubMed ID: 11655828
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Closing the circle of constitutional review from Griswold v. Connecticut to Roe v. Wade: an outline of a decision merely overruling Roe.
Van Alstyne W
Duke Law J; 1989 Dec; 1989(6):1677-88. PubMed ID: 11656009
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Unenumerated rights: whether and how Roe should be overruled.
Dworkin R
Univ Chic Law Rev; 1992; 59(1):381-432. PubMed ID: 11656301
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. The erosion of Roe v. Wade; do minors have any rights?
Sourial WH
Whittier Law Rev; 1992; 13(1):285-332. PubMed ID: 11656215
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Rethinking Roe v. Wade.
Wardle LD
Brigh Young Univ Law Rev; 1985; 1985(2):231-64. PubMed ID: 11655792
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Will there be a constitutional right to abortion after the reconsideration of Roe v. Wade?
Bopp J
J Contemp Law; 1989; 15(2):131-73. PubMed ID: 11655991
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. The Supreme Court, the "facts of life" and "the thoughtful part of the nation.
Destro RA
Hum Life Rev; 1994; 20(3):28-48. PubMed ID: 11656359
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. From arguments to Supreme Court opinions in Planned Parenthood v. Casey.
Kassop N
PS (Wash DC); 1993 Mar; 26(1):53-8. PubMed ID: 12085874
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Technological advances and Roe v. Wade: the need to rethink abortion law.
Martyn K
UCLA Law Rev; 1982; 29(5-6):1194-215. PubMed ID: 11655743
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Prenatal caretaking: limits of state intervention with and without Roe.
Rush SE
Univ Fla Law Rev; 1987; 39(1):55-112. PubMed ID: 11658954
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Beyond the Roe debate: judicial experience with the 1980's "reasonableness" test.
Farber DA; Nowak JE
Va Law Rev; 1990 Apr; 76(3):519-38. PubMed ID: 11659370
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Roe v. Wade and the traditional legal standards concerning pregnancy.
Hopkin WR
Temple Law Q; 1974; 47(4):715-38. PubMed ID: 11664349
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. A thorn in the side of privacy: the need for reassessment of the constitutional right to abortion.
Kunz KA
Marquette Law Rev; 1987; 70(3):534-71. PubMed ID: 11655884
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Pregnant women's rights and the legal impact of theories of when life begins.
Crepps J; Miller A
Am J Ethics Med; 1994; 3(1):28-9. PubMed ID: 11652827
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Privacy, abortion, and judicial review: haunted by the ghost of Lochner.
Garfield H
Wash Law Rev; 1986 Apr; 61(2):293-365. PubMed ID: 11652501
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Abortion, absolutism, and compromise.
Carter SL
Yale Law J; 1991 Jun; 100(8):2747-66. PubMed ID: 11656152
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
