These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

244 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11656009)

  • 1. Closing the circle of constitutional review from Griswold v. Connecticut to Roe v. Wade: an outline of a decision merely overruling Roe.
    Van Alstyne W
    Duke Law J; 1989 Dec; 1989(6):1677-88. PubMed ID: 11656009
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Why Roe v. Wade should be overruled.
    Loewy AH
    North Carol Law Rev; 1989 Apr; 67(4):939-48. PubMed ID: 11655982
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A decision-theoretic reconstruction of Roe v. Wade.
    Lockhart T
    Public Aff Q; 1991 Jul; 5(3):243-58. PubMed ID: 11656064
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Planned Parenthood v. Casey: the death of repose in reproductive decisionmaking.
    Nivala J
    Const Law J; 1993; 4(1):47-95. PubMed ID: 12083095
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Trimesters and technology: revamping Roe v. Wade.
    Rhoden NK
    Yale Law J; 1986 Mar; 95(4):639-97. PubMed ID: 11655828
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Implications of the coming retreat from Roe v. Wade.
    Rice CF
    J Contemp Health Law Policy; 1988; 4():1-21. PubMed ID: 11645610
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Revisiting Roe v. Wade: substance and process in the abortion debate.
    Farrell MG
    Indiana Law J; 1993; 68(2):269-362. PubMed ID: 11656341
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Planned Parenthood v. Casey: the flight from reason in the Supreme Court.
    Linton PB
    St Louis Univ Public Law Rev; 1993; 13(1):15-137. PubMed ID: 11656611
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Rethinking Roe v. Wade.
    Wardle LD
    Brigh Young Univ Law Rev; 1985; 1985(2):231-64. PubMed ID: 11655792
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Roe v. Wade and the traditional legal standards concerning pregnancy.
    Hopkin WR
    Temple Law Q; 1974; 47(4):715-38. PubMed ID: 11664349
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The Supreme Court, the "facts of life" and "the thoughtful part of the nation.
    Destro RA
    Hum Life Rev; 1994; 20(3):28-48. PubMed ID: 11656359
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Roe v. Wade and Doe v. Bolton: the compelling state interest test in substantive due process.
    Gelinas A
    Wash Lee Law Rev; 1973; 30(3):628-46. PubMed ID: 11663508
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The erosion of Roe v. Wade; do minors have any rights?
    Sourial WH
    Whittier Law Rev; 1992; 13(1):285-332. PubMed ID: 11656215
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Technological advances and Roe v. Wade: the need to rethink abortion law.
    Martyn K
    UCLA Law Rev; 1982; 29(5-6):1194-215. PubMed ID: 11655743
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Perspectives on the abortion controversy: amici for appellees -- Brief for bioethicists for privacy as amicus curiae supporting appellees Webster and women's equality Webster and the fundamental right to make medical decisions Abortion counseling and the First Amendment: open questions after Webster Brief for 885 law professors in support of maintaining adherence to the Roe decision.
    Annas GJ; Glantz LH; Mariner WK; Johnsen D; Wilder MJ; Orentlicher D; Pine RN; Michelman FI; Redlich N; Neuwirth SR; Carty-Bennia D
    Am J Law Med; 1990 Jan; 15(2-3):169-203. PubMed ID: 11656584
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Will there be a constitutional right to abortion after the reconsideration of Roe v. Wade?
    Bopp J
    J Contemp Law; 1989; 15(2):131-73. PubMed ID: 11655991
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Webster v. Reproductive Health Services: devaluing the right to choose.
    Binion G
    Women Polit; 1991; 11(2):41-60. PubMed ID: 11656100
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Will Roe v. Wade survive the Rehnquist Court?
    Johnsen D; Wilder M
    Nova Law Rev; 1989; 13(2):457-69. PubMed ID: 11650350
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Roe v. Wade: a retrospective look at a judicial oxymoron.
    Coleman JJ
    St Louis Univ Law J; 1984 Dec; 29(7):7-44. PubMed ID: 11655813
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. High court asks sharp questions in abortion case.
    Greenhouse L
    N Y Times Web; 1989 Apr; ():A1, B14. PubMed ID: 11646764
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.