These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
219 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11656011)
1. Republican schoolmaster: the U.S. Supreme Court, public opinion, and abortion. Franklin CH; Kosaki LC Am Polit Sci Rev; 1989 Sep; 83(3):751-71. PubMed ID: 11656011 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Legitimacy and the empowerment of discretionary legal authority: the United States Supreme Court and abortion rights. Tyler TR; Mitchell G Duke Law J; 1994 Feb; 43(4):703-815. PubMed ID: 11656384 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Some sociological and psychological reflections on the abortion decisions. Ryle EJ Jurist; 1973; 33(2):218-29. PubMed ID: 11663433 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. The gap between law and moral order: an examination of the legitimacy of the Supreme Court abortion decisions. Wardle LD Brigh Young Univ Law Rev; 1980; 1980(4):811-35. PubMed ID: 11655721 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. The Supreme Court's abortion decisions: some observations on the exercise of judicial review in the United States. Grossman JB Sven Juristtidn; 1973; 58(6-7):449-62. PubMed ID: 11663642 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Revisiting Roe v. Wade: substance and process in the abortion debate. Farrell MG Indiana Law J; 1993; 68(2):269-362. PubMed ID: 11656341 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Abortion, absolutism, and compromise. Carter SL Yale Law J; 1991 Jun; 100(8):2747-66. PubMed ID: 11656152 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Mediating the polar extremes: a guide to post-Webster abortion policy. Wilkins RG; Sherlock R; Clark S Brigh Young Univ Law Rev; 1991; 1991(1):403-87. PubMed ID: 11656173 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. How not to promote serious deliberation about abortion. McConnell MW Univ Chic Law Rev; 1991; 58(3):1181-202. PubMed ID: 11656153 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. A stunning approval for abortion. Time; 1973 Feb; 101(6):50-1. PubMed ID: 11663394 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Two views on the human life amendment. Neuhaus RJ; Garvey J US Cathol; 1977 Apr; 42(4):28-31. PubMed ID: 11663765 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Political and socioeconomic indicators of state restrictiveness toward abortion. Strickland RA; Whicker ML Policy Stud J; 1992; 20(4):598-617. PubMed ID: 11660186 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. A law without honor. Casey RP Hum Life Rev; 1993; 19(2):54-64. PubMed ID: 11656243 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Abortion policy in the post-Webster age. Halva-Neubauer G Publius; 1990; 20(3):27-44. PubMed ID: 11656128 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. The class conflict over abortion. Skerry P Public Interest; 1978; (52):. PubMed ID: 11663974 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Living with Roe v. Wade. McConnell ML Commentary; 1990 Nov; 90(5):34-8. PubMed ID: 11656047 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Abortion and the Supreme Court: some are more equal than others. Segers MC Hastings Cent Rep; 1977 Aug; 7(4):5-6. PubMed ID: 330461 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]