These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
340 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11656016)
1. Reproductive laws, women of color, and low-income women. Nsiah-Jefferson L Womens Rights Law Report; 1989; 11(1):15-38. PubMed ID: 11656016 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. The body invaded: medical surveillance of women as reproducers. Terry J Social Rev; 1989; 89(3):13-43. PubMed ID: 11655979 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. The new reproductive technologies: a technological handmaid's tale. National Action Committee on the Status of Women (Canada) Issues Reprod Genet Eng; 1991; 4(3):279-96. PubMed ID: 11651221 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Control of childbearing by HIV-positive women: some responses to emerging legal policies. Sangree S Buffalo Law Rev; 1993; 41(2):309-449. PubMed ID: 11659735 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. AIDS and the future of reproductive freedom. Bayer R Milbank Q; 1990; 68(Suppl. 2):179-204. PubMed ID: 11653914 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. "Fetal rights" and the new eugenics. Hubbard R Sci People; 1984; 16(2):7-9, 27-29. PubMed ID: 11649544 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Legal issues: drug testing of postpartum women and newborns as the basis for civil and criminal proceedings. Moss KL Clgh Rev; 1990 Mar; 23(11):1406-14. PubMed ID: 11659232 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. The toxic workplace: Title VII protection for the potentially pregnant person. Andrade VM Harv Womens Law J; 1981; 4(1):71-105. PubMed ID: 11649449 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. A womb of one's own: the real population problem. Hartmann B Sci People; 1987; 19(4):9-12. PubMed ID: 11655839 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Fetal rights: a new assault on feminism. Pollitt K Nation; 1990 Mar; 250(12):409-411, 414-416, 418. PubMed ID: 11656424 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. "Pluck a fetus from its womb": a critique of current attitudes toward the embryo/fetus. Overall C Univ West Ont Law Rev; 1986 Jun; 24(1):1-14. PubMed ID: 11651875 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Pregnancy and AIDS. Field MA MD Law Rev; 1993; 52(2):402-36. PubMed ID: 11659754 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Norplant meets the new eugenicists: the impermissibility of coerced contraception. Mertus J; Heller S St Louis Univ Public Law Rev; 1992; 11(2):359-83. PubMed ID: 11652703 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Doctors, patients and the Constitution: a theoretical analysis of the physician's role in "private" reproductive decisions. Appleton SF Wash Univ Law Q; 1985; 63(2):183-236. PubMed ID: 11656658 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Getting beyond discrimination: a regulatory solution to the problem of fetal hazards in the workplace. Buss E Yale Law J; 1986 Jan; 95(3):577-98. PubMed ID: 11658700 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Protection of the rights of pregnant women in prisons and detention facilities. McHugh GA New Engl J Prison Law; 1980; 6(2):231-63. PubMed ID: 11655730 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Human sterilization: emerging technologies and reemerging social issues. Blank RH Sci Technol Human Values; 1984; 9(3):8-20. PubMed ID: 11658527 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Predicting the future of privacy in pregnancy: how medical technology affects the legal rights of pregnant women. Annas GJ Nova Law Rev; 1989; 13(2):329-53. PubMed ID: 11650347 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Norplant: the new scarlet letter? Flannery MT J Contemp Health Law Policy; 1992; 8():201-26. PubMed ID: 11645739 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]