These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
301 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11656050)
1. The Canadian abortion quagmire: the way in and a way out. Hunter IA Can Fam Law Q; 1990; 6():57-78. PubMed ID: 11656050 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Impact of the abortion decisions upon the father's role. Witherspoon JP Jurist; 1975; 35(1):32-65. PubMed ID: 11664577 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. The new pro-life legislation: patterns and recommendations. Witherspoon JP St Marys Law J; 1976; 7(4):637-97. PubMed ID: 11664635 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. The limits of judicial intervention in abortion politics. Tatalovich R; Daynes BW Christ Century; 1982 Jan 6-13; 99(1):16-20. PubMed ID: 11655445 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Right to life of the unborn. Garn Je Congr Rec (Dly Ed); 1981 Jan; 127(12):S567-78. PubMed ID: 11665256 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Enforcement of state abortion statutes after Roe: a state-by-state analysis. Linton PB Univ Detroit Law Rev; 1990; 67(2):157-259. PubMed ID: 11659261 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Abortion and section 7 of the Charter: proposing a constitutionally valid foetal protection law. McCourt KM; Love DJ Manit Law J; 1989; 18(3):365-94. PubMed ID: 11656021 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. The constitutionality of the Human Life Bill. Ruf BA Wash Univ Law Q; 1983; 61(1):219-52. PubMed ID: 11655816 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Mediating the polar extremes: a guide to post-Webster abortion policy. Wilkins RG; Sherlock R; Clark S Brigh Young Univ Law Rev; 1991; 1991(1):403-87. PubMed ID: 11656173 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. S.J. Res. 110: Human Life Federalism Amendment. Hatch OG Congr Rec (Dly Ed); 1981 Sep; 127(131):S10194-8. PubMed ID: 11658572 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Abortion and liberalism: a comparison between the abortion decisions of the Supreme Court of the United States and the Constitutional Court of West Germany. Morris DG Hastings Int Comp Law Rev; 1988; 11(2):159-245. PubMed ID: 11655935 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Abortion: history, opinions, and what's new in the United States. Jubb ED Can Bar J; 1973 Jul; 4(3):8-12. PubMed ID: 11663761 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Abortion in Canada. Dunlop M BMJ; 1989 Aug; 299(6697):474-5. PubMed ID: 11644416 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Sui generis: the legal nature of the foetus in Canada. McConnell ML Can Bar Rev; 1991; 70():548-56. PubMed ID: 11656180 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Roe v. Wade and the traditional legal standards concerning pregnancy. Hopkin WR Temple Law Q; 1974; 47(4):715-38. PubMed ID: 11664349 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. The Supreme Court 1972 term. Foreward: toward a model of roles in the due process of life and law. Tribe LH Harv Law Rev; 1973 Nov; 87(1):1-53. PubMed ID: 11663596 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Abortion and democracy for women: a critique of Tremblay v. Daigle. Greschner D McGill Law J; 1990 Sep; 35(3):633-69. PubMed ID: 11656074 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]