197 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11656052)
1. Taking rights seriously in the abortion case.
Dworkin R
Ratio Juris; 1990 Mar; 3(1):68-80. PubMed ID: 11656052
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. The Constitution and abortion.
Campbell A
Mod Law Rev; 1990 Mar; 53(2):238-48. PubMed ID: 11656038
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. High court asks sharp questions in abortion case.
Greenhouse L
N Y Times Web; 1989 Apr; ():A1, B14. PubMed ID: 11646764
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. The Webster amicus curiae briefs: perspectives on the abortion controversy and the role of the Supreme Court -- amici for appellees.
Annas GJ
Am J Law Med; 1989; 15(2-3):169-203. PubMed ID: 11644396
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Logic, law and abortion.
Degnan M; Pannier R
Linacre Q; 1992 Feb; 59(1):53-8. PubMed ID: 11652613
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Abortion and the right of privacy.
Ortega ML
Philipp Law J; 1973; 48(4-5):652-95. PubMed ID: 11663743
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Unenumerated rights: whether and how Roe should be overruled.
Dworkin R
Univ Chic Law Rev; 1992; 59(1):381-432. PubMed ID: 11656301
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Abortion politics: writing for an audience of one.
Estrich SR; Sullivan KM
Univ PA Law Rev; 1989 Nov; 138(1):119-55. PubMed ID: 11656496
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Roe v. Wade: a retrospective look at a judicial oxymoron.
Coleman JJ
St Louis Univ Law J; 1984 Dec; 29(7):7-44. PubMed ID: 11655813
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Technological advances and Roe v. Wade: the need to rethink abortion law.
Martyn K
UCLA Law Rev; 1982; 29(5-6):1194-215. PubMed ID: 11655743
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. The constitutional morality of abortion.
Brownstein A; Dau P
Boston Coll Law Rev; 1992 Jul; 33(4):689-761. PubMed ID: 11656217
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. The dilemma of the Webster decision: deconstitutionalizing the trimester system.
Kindregan CP
Report Hum Reprod Law; 1990; 25-26():276-92. PubMed ID: 11686167
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Roe v. Wade and Doe v. Bolton: the compelling state interest test in substantive due process.
Gelinas A
Wash Lee Law Rev; 1973; 30(3):628-46. PubMed ID: 11663508
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. On the legal status of the proposition that "life begins at conception.
Rubenfeld J
Stanford Law Rev; 1991 Feb; 43(3):599-635. PubMed ID: 11645689
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Roe v. Wade and the traditional legal standards concerning pregnancy.
Hopkin WR
Temple Law Q; 1974; 47(4):715-38. PubMed ID: 11664349
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Webster v. Reproductive Health Services: devaluing the right to choose.
Binion G
Women Polit; 1991; 11(2):41-60. PubMed ID: 11656100
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Reason, revelation and liberal justice: reflections on George Grant's analysis of Roe v. Wade.
Mathie W
Can J Polit Sci; 1986 Sep; 19(3):443-66. PubMed ID: 11658853
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Perspectives on the abortion controversy: amici for appellees -- Brief for bioethicists for privacy as amicus curiae supporting appellees Webster and women's equality Webster and the fundamental right to make medical decisions Abortion counseling and the First Amendment: open questions after Webster Brief for 885 law professors in support of maintaining adherence to the Roe decision.
Annas GJ; Glantz LH; Mariner WK; Johnsen D; Wilder MJ; Orentlicher D; Pine RN; Michelman FI; Redlich N; Neuwirth SR; Carty-Bennia D
Am J Law Med; 1990 Jan; 15(2-3):169-203. PubMed ID: 11656584
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. A decision-theoretic reconstruction of Roe v. Wade.
Lockhart T
Public Aff Q; 1991 Jul; 5(3):243-58. PubMed ID: 11656064
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Reproductive Health Services v. Webster.
U.S. District Court, W.D. Missouri, C.D
Fed Suppl; 1987 Mar; 655():1300-22. PubMed ID: 11648372
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
