These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
197 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11656052)
21. The legal status of the unborn after Webster. Parness JA Dickinson Law Rev; 1990; 95(1):1-22. PubMed ID: 11659394 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. Reproductive Health Services v. Webster. U.S. District Court, W.D. Missouri, C.D. Fed Suppl; 1987 Apr; 662():407-30. PubMed ID: 11648378 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Social commentary: values and legal personhood. Parness JA West VA Law Rev; 1981; 83(3):487-503. PubMed ID: 11655572 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. Court gets stark arguments on abortion. Greenhouse L N Y Times Web; 1992 Apr; ():A1, B10-11. PubMed ID: 11646254 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Prenatal caretaking: limits of state intervention with and without Roe. Rush SE Univ Fla Law Rev; 1987; 39(1):55-112. PubMed ID: 11658954 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Floyd v. Anders. 4 Nov 1977. U.S. District Court, D. South Carolina, Columbia Division Fed Suppl; 1977; 440():535-40. PubMed ID: 11646007 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. A divisive issue and a divided court: Planned Parenthood v. Casey. Campbell A Oxf J Leg Stud; 1993; 13(4):571-83. PubMed ID: 11656374 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Webster v. Reproductive Health Services. U.S. Supreme Court Wests Supreme Court Report; 1989 Jul; 109():3040-85. PubMed ID: 12041289 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. The Webster amicus curiae briefs: perspectives on the abortion controversy and the role of the Supreme Court -- amici for appellants. Blaustein AP Am J Law Med; 1989; 15(2-3):204-33. PubMed ID: 11644397 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Implications of the coming retreat from Roe v. Wade. Rice CF J Contemp Health Law Policy; 1988; 4():1-21. PubMed ID: 11645610 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Rationalizing the abortion debate: legal rhetoric and the abortion controversy. Chemerinsky E Buffalo Law Rev; 1982; 31(1):107-64. PubMed ID: 11655711 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Death before life: abortion as a moral symbol. Frankel LH; Flynn JJ J Contemp Law; 1975; 1(2):267-85. PubMed ID: 11662359 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Oh my God, I'm pregnant. Minter CV Ohio North Univ Law Rev; 1973; 1(1):119-29. PubMed ID: 11663469 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Judicial restraint and the non-decision in Webster v. Reproductive Health Services. Crain CA Harv J Law Public Policy; 1990; 13(1):263-318. PubMed ID: 11649286 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Reproductive Health Services v. Webster. U.S. Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit Fed Report; 1988 Jul; 851():1071-85. PubMed ID: 11648383 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Justices uphold abortion rights by narrow vote. Taylor S N Y Times Web; 1986 Jun; ():A1, B10-11. PubMed ID: 11647367 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Political effects of court decisions on abortion: a comparison between the United States and the German Federal Republic. George J Int J Law Fam; 1989 Apr; 3(1):106-36. PubMed ID: 11656044 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Fetal viability as a threshold to personhood. A legal analysis. Peterfy A J Leg Med; 1995 Dec; 16(4):607-36. PubMed ID: 8568420 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. The fetus under Section 1983: still struggling for recognition. Czepiga PT Syracuse Law Rev; 1983; 34(4):1029-65. PubMed ID: 11655745 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]