These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
197 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11656052)
41. Current technology affecting Supreme Court abortion jurisprudence. Buckley M NY Law Sch Law Rev; 1982; 27(4):1221-60. PubMed ID: 11651778 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
42. The new pro-life legislation: patterns and recommendations. Witherspoon JP St Marys Law J; 1976; 7(4):637-97. PubMed ID: 11664635 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
43. Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania v. Casey: the reaffirmation of Roe or the beginning of the end? Henry KS Univ Louisv J Fam Law; 1993-1994 Winter; 32(1):93-113. PubMed ID: 11660011 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
45. Nor piety nor wit: the Supreme Court on abortion. Dellapenna JW Columbia Human Rights Law Rev; 1974 Fall-1975 Winter; 6(2):379-413. PubMed ID: 11663599 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
46. Abortion: toward a standard based upon clinical medical signs of life and death. Kennedy JE; Nicolazzo M J Fam Law; 1984-1985; 23(4):545-63. PubMed ID: 11655793 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
47. Justice Holmes and Roe v. Wade. Novick SM Trial; 1989 Dec; 25(12):58-64. PubMed ID: 11656018 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
48. Waller, Warnock and Roe v. Wade: variations on the status of the orphan embryo--comment. Van de Weghe B J Contemp Health Law Policy; 1986; 2():231-54. PubMed ID: 11645586 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
49. Abortion compromise -- inevitable and impossible. Law SA Univ Ill Law Rev; 1992; 25(4):921-41. PubMed ID: 11656296 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
50. The right to abortion: expansion of the right to privacy through the Fourteenth Amendment. Goldenberg D Cathol Lawyer; 1973; 19(1):36-57. PubMed ID: 11663414 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
51. Overruling Roe v. Wade: an analysis of the proposed Constitutional amendments. Rice CE Boston Coll Ind Commer Law Rev; 1973 Dec; 15(2):307-41. PubMed ID: 11663416 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
52. The Human Life Federalism Amendment: an assessment. Caron WR Cathol Lawyer; 1982; 27(2):87-111. PubMed ID: 11655614 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
53. A thorn in the side of privacy: the need for reassessment of the constitutional right to abortion. Kunz KA Marquette Law Rev; 1987; 70(3):534-71. PubMed ID: 11655884 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
55. The creation of fetal rights: conflicts with women's constitutional rights to liberty, privacy, and equal protection. Johnsen DE Yale Law J; 1986 Jan; 95(3):599-625. PubMed ID: 11658701 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
56. Abortion: trouble ahead. Greenhouse L N Y Times Web; 1989 Jul; ():A1, A16. PubMed ID: 11647407 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
57. Some thoughts on autonomy and equality in relation to Roe v. Wade. Ginsburg RB North Carol Law Rev; 1985 Jan; 63(2):375-86. PubMed ID: 11656660 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
58. Roe v. Wade: its impact on rights of choice in human reproduction. Patton DE Columbia Human Rights Law Rev; 1973; 5(2):497-521. PubMed ID: 11663415 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
59. Taking aim at Roe v. Wade. Gorney C Washington Post; 1989 Apr; ():18-26, 42-44. PubMed ID: 11655908 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
60. "Unwanted, anonymous, biological descendants": mandatory donation laws and laws prohibiting preembryo discard violate the constitutional right to privacy. Brown JP Univ San Francisco Law Rev; 1993; 28(1):183-237. PubMed ID: 11659778 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]