These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
200 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11656072)
1. Judicial review and abortion in Canada: lessons for the United States in the wake of Webster v. Reproductive Health Services. Beschle DL Univ Colo Law Rev; 1990; 61(3):537-65. PubMed ID: 11656072 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. A beau mentir qui vient de loin: the 1988 Canadian abortion decision in comparative perspective. Glendon MA Northwest Univ Law Rev; 1989; 83(3):569-91. PubMed ID: 11655964 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. "Even by commonsense morality": Morgentaler, Borowski, and the Constitution of Canada. McConnell ML Can Bar Rev; 1989 Mar; 68(1):765-96. PubMed ID: 11656020 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Canada's Roe: the Canadian abortion decision and its implications for American constitutional law and theory. Conkle DO Const Comment; 1989; 6(2):299-318. PubMed ID: 11655992 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. The Morgentaler decision: Parliament's options. Hovius B Can Fam Law Q; 1988; 3():137-65. PubMed ID: 11659378 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Feminist litigation: an oxymoron? -- a study of the briefs filed in William L. Webster v. Reproductive Health Services. Colker R Harv Womens Law J; 1990; 13():137-88. PubMed ID: 11656053 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. The dilemma of the Webster decision: deconstitutionalizing the trimester system. Kindregan CP Report Hum Reprod Law; 1990; 25-26():276-92. PubMed ID: 11686167 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Abortion and section 7 of the Charter: proposing a constitutionally valid foetal protection law. McCourt KM; Love DJ Manit Law J; 1989; 18(3):365-94. PubMed ID: 11656021 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Abortion and the freedom to travel in the European Economic Community: a perspective on Attorney General v. X. Stoffregen SS New Engl Law Rev; 1993; 28(2):543-76. PubMed ID: 11656448 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Is West Germany's 1975 abortion decision a solution to the American abortion debate?: a critique of Mary Ann Glendon and Donald Kommers. Miedel F Rev Law Soc Change; 1993-1994; 20(3):471-515. PubMed ID: 11656404 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Abortion and liberalism: a comparison between the abortion decisions of the Supreme Court of the United States and the Constitutional Court of West Germany. Morris DG Hastings Int Comp Law Rev; 1988; 11(2):159-245. PubMed ID: 11655935 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. The politics of abortion. Gearty C J Law Soc; 1992; 19(4):441-53. PubMed ID: 11656230 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Abortion and dialogue. Colker R Tulane Law Rev; 1989 Jun; 63(6):1363-403. PubMed ID: 11659218 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Liberty, abortion, and constitutional review in Canada. Marshall G Public Law; 1988; ():199-211. PubMed ID: 11655934 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Mediating the polar extremes: a guide to post-Webster abortion policy. Wilkins RG; Sherlock R; Clark S Brigh Young Univ Law Rev; 1991; 1991(1):403-87. PubMed ID: 11656173 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Abortion debate revived in Canada. Burns JF N Y Times Web; 1988 Feb; ():6. PubMed ID: 11647384 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. The discourse ethics alternative to Rust v. Sullivan. Leedes GC Univ Richmond Law Rev; 1991; 26(1):87-143. PubMed ID: 11659547 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. The Supreme Court, the "facts of life" and "the thoughtful part of the nation. Destro RA Hum Life Rev; 1994; 20(3):28-48. PubMed ID: 11656359 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Notes from the field: a reply to Professor Colker. Burns SE Harv Womens Law J; 1990; 13():189-206. PubMed ID: 11656054 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]