These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
133 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11656084)
21. Recombinant DNA and the regulation of biotechnology: reflections on the Asilomar Conference, ten years after. Barkstrom JE Akron Law Rev; 1985; 19(1):81-126. PubMed ID: 11650740 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. Proposals on genetic technology: U.S. panel urges easing of regulation. Andrews EL N Y Times Web; 1991 Feb; ():D1, D7. PubMed ID: 11646818 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Genetically Modified Organisms (Northern Ireland) Order 1991. Great Britain Commer Law Eur; 1991 Nov; 14(11):. PubMed ID: 12038311 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. NIH guidelines for research involving recombinant DNA molecules. Wilson DJ Account Res; 1993; 3(2-3):177-85. PubMed ID: 11652293 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Summary and critique of the new NIH guidelines for recombinant DNA research. Szybalski W Gene; 1979; 5():179-181+. PubMed ID: 11660940 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Recombinant DNA research: actions under the guidelines; notice. U.S. National Institutes of Health Fed Regist; 1995 Apr; 60(81):20726-37. PubMed ID: 11656763 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. A shepherd for transgenic animals. Connor S New Sci; 1989 Jan; 121(1648):25. PubMed ID: 11655927 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Questions raised over how U.S. backed genetically altered virus. Schneider K N Y Times Web; 1986 Apr; ():A1, A20. PubMed ID: 11646465 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. The regulation of recombinant DNA research: the alternative of local control. Rosenblatt DP Boston Coll Environ Aff Law Rev; 1982; 10(1):37-78. PubMed ID: 11649694 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. USDA biotechnology review criticized and defended. Sun M Science; 1986 Apr; 232(4748):316. PubMed ID: 11643917 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. The emerging federalism of U.S. biotechnology policy. Webber DJ Politics Life Sci; 1995 Feb; 14(1):65-72. PubMed ID: 11654872 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Recombinant DNA molecules research, proposed actions under guidelines; notice. U.S. National Institutes of Health Fed Regist; 1985 Aug; 50(160):33462-7. PubMed ID: 11655784 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. A case analysis of NEPA implementation: NIH and DNA recombinant research. Chalker SM; Catz RS Duke Law J; 1978 Mar; 1978(1):57-112. PubMed ID: 11661621 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. An historical development of patenting microorganisms and genetically engineered animals in the USA and Europe. McTaggart RJ Eur J Genet Soc; 1996; 2(1):2-14. PubMed ID: 11658254 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Recombinant DNA research; proposed actions under guidelines. U.S. National Institutes of Health Fed Regist; 1981 Mar; 46(54):17994-7. PubMed ID: 11655491 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Industry gene-splice field tests approved. Miller JA Sci News; 1984 Jun; 125(23):356. PubMed ID: 11653555 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Administration divided over OECD biotech plan. Sun M Science; 1985 Aug; 229(4716):842-3. PubMed ID: 11643793 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Recombinant DNA research; advisory committee meeting and proposed action under guidelines; notices. U.S. National Institutes of Health Fed Regist; 1986 Jun; 51(122):23210-1. PubMed ID: 11655768 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. Guidelines for research involving recombinant DNA molecules. U.S. National Institutes of Health Fed Regist; 1980 Jan; 45(20):6723-49. PubMed ID: 11664126 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]