464 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11656128)
1. Abortion policy in the post-Webster age.
Halva-Neubauer G
Publius; 1990; 20(3):27-44. PubMed ID: 11656128
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Testimony opposing "Freedom of Choice Act.
Alvare H;
Origins; 1992 Apr; 21(43):692-6. PubMed ID: 11656134
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Mediating the polar extremes: a guide to post-Webster abortion policy.
Wilkins RG; Sherlock R; Clark S
Brigh Young Univ Law Rev; 1991; 1991(1):403-87. PubMed ID: 11656173
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. The phenomenon of antique laws: can a state revive old abortion laws in a new era?
Plave EF
George Washington Law Rev; 1989 Nov; 58(1):111-24. PubMed ID: 11656013
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Abortion as a vice crime: a "what if" story.
Kaplan J
Law Contemp Probl; 1988; 51(1):151-79. PubMed ID: 11650281
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Implications of the abortion decisions: post Roe and Doe litigation and legislation.
Wasserman R
Columbia Law Rev; 1974 Mar; 74(2):237-68. PubMed ID: 11664412
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Toward a more perfect union: a federal cause of action for physician aid-in-dying.
Robichaud TD
Univ Mich J Law Reform; 1994; 27(2):521-64. PubMed ID: 11656405
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. "Social abortion" pre and post Webster.
Bannon AE; Nigro SA
State Health Legis Rep; 1989 Dec; 17(4):9-19. PubMed ID: 11655955
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. The constitutionality of the Freedom of Choice Act of 1993.
Axel DA
Hastings Law J; 1994; 45(3):641-65. PubMed ID: 11656418
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Abortion, conscience and the Constitution: an examination of federal institutional conscience clauses.
Pilpel HF; Patton DE
Columbia Human Rights Law Rev; 1974 Fall-1975 Winter; 6(2):279-305. PubMed ID: 11663597
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. High court pondering fine points of abortion issue.
Wood AP
Ob Gyn News; 1982 Jan 15-31; 18(2):1, 36-37. PubMed ID: 11655557
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. The Supreme Court, abortion policy, and state response: a preliminary analysis.
Nicholson JB; Steward DW
Publius; 1978; 8(1):159-78. PubMed ID: 11664024
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. "But whoever treasures freedom...": the right to travel and extraterritorial abortions.
Kreimer SF
Mich Law Rev; 1993 Mar; 91(5):907-38. PubMed ID: 11656299
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Abortion still a constitutional issue.
Lancet; 1983 Apr; 1(8329):866-7. PubMed ID: 11644255
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Letting the states set abortion policy.
Rosenblum VG
Christ Century; 1989 Mar; 106(8):252-3. PubMed ID: 11655921
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. A wink from the bench: the federal courts and abortion.
Uddo BJ
Tulane Law Rev; 1979 Feb; 53(2):398-464. PubMed ID: 11665104
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. The unborn and the born again.
New Repub; 1977 Jul; 177(27):5-6+. PubMed ID: 11663777
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. High court to review abortion regulations in three states.
Wood AP
Ob Gyn News; 1982 Aug 1-14; 17(15):1, 18. PubMed ID: 11655564
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. State limitations upon the availability and accessibility of abortions after Wade and Bolton.
Finn J
Univ Kans Law Rev; 1976; 25(1):87-107. PubMed ID: 11663734
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. The selective funding problem: abortions and religious schools.
McConnell MW
Harv Law Rev; 1991 Mar; 104(5):989-1050. PubMed ID: 11656068
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
