These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
22. Fetal tissue transplants. Robertson JA Wash Univ Law Q; 1988; 66(3):443-98. PubMed ID: 11659170 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. The constitutional morality of abortion. Brownstein A; Dau P Boston Coll Law Rev; 1992 Jul; 33(4):689-761. PubMed ID: 11656217 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. Criminal liability for substance abuse during pregnancy: the controversy of maternal v. fetal rights. Dobson T; Eby KK St Louis Univ Law J; 1992; 36(3):655-94. PubMed ID: 11659686 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Abortion: law, religion and society. Bube PC Bioethics Forum; 1993; 9(1):12-8. PubMed ID: 11651641 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Of gametes and guardians: the impropriety of appointing guardians ad litem for fetuses and embryos. Goldberg S Wash Law Rev; 1991 Apr; 66(2):503-44. PubMed ID: 11656073 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Validity, under Federal Constitution, of abortion laws. Shapiro SR US Supreme Court Rep; 1974; 35():735-69. PubMed ID: 11663483 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. The woman's right to know: a model approach to the informed consent of abortion. Renfer SO; Shaheen R; Hegarty M Loyola Univ Chic Law J; 1991; 22(2):409-43. PubMed ID: 11651345 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. How rights are infringed: the role of undue burden analysis in constitutional doctrine. Brownstein A Hastings Law J; 1994 Apr; 45(4):867-959. PubMed ID: 11656422 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Power and procreation: state interference in pregnancy. Hanigsberg JE Ottawa Law Rev; 1991; 23(1):35-70. PubMed ID: 11656189 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. The precarious unity of feminist theory and practice: the praxis of abortion. Cossman B Univ Tor Fac Law Rev; 1986; 44(1):85-108. PubMed ID: 11659122 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Autonomy's magic wand: abortion and constitutional interpretation. Allen AL Boston Univ Law Rev; 1992 Sep; 72(4):683-98. PubMed ID: 11656223 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Forced obstetrical intervention: a charter analysis. Grant I Univ Tor Law J; 1989; 39(3):217-57. PubMed ID: 11656008 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. A new crime, fetal neglect: state intervention to protect the unborn--protection at what cost? Manson R; Marolt J Calif West Law Rev; 1987-1988; 24(1):161-82. PubMed ID: 11650070 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Notes from the field: a reply to Professor Colker. Burns SE Harv Womens Law J; 1990; 13():189-206. PubMed ID: 11656054 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Procreative liberty and the control of conception, pregnancy, and childbirth. Robertson JA Va Law Rev; 1983 Apr; 69(3):405-64. PubMed ID: 11651806 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Abortion and international law: the status and possible extension of women's right to privacy. Michel AE J Fam Law; 1981-1982; 20(2):241-61. PubMed ID: 11655655 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. In the matter of Baby M: rejudged. Raymond JG Reprod Genet Eng; 1988; 1(2):175-81. PubMed ID: 11650375 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. Forced labor: a thirteenth amendment defense of abortion. Koppelman A Northwest Univ Law Rev; 1990; 84(2):480-535. PubMed ID: 11656392 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]