435 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11656189)
1. Power and procreation: state interference in pregnancy.
Hanigsberg JE
Ottawa Law Rev; 1991; 23(1):35-70. PubMed ID: 11656189
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. The creation of fetal rights: conflicts with women's constitutional rights to liberty, privacy, and equal protection.
Johnsen DE
Yale Law J; 1986 Jan; 95(3):599-625. PubMed ID: 11658701
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Judicial intervention in pregnancy.
Martin S; Coleman M
McGill Law J; 1995 Aug; 40(4):947-91. PubMed ID: 11654475
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. A feminist response to 'Unborn child abuse: contemplating legal solution.
Dawson TB
Can J Fam Law; 1991; 9(2):157-76. PubMed ID: 11656495
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Forced obstetrical intervention: a charter analysis.
Grant I
Univ Tor Law J; 1989; 39(3):217-57. PubMed ID: 11656008
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Re Baby R: a comment on fetal apprehension.
Dawson TB
Can J Women Law; 1990; 4(1):265-75. PubMed ID: 11649295
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Rethinking (m)otherhood: feminist theory and state regulation of pregnancy.
Harv Law Rev; 1990 Apr; 103(6):1325-43. PubMed ID: 11656270
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Procreative liberty and the control of conception, pregnancy, and childbirth.
Robertson JA
Va Law Rev; 1983 Apr; 69(3):405-64. PubMed ID: 11651806
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Shared interests: promoting healthy births without sacrificing women's liberty.
Johnsen D
Hastings Law J; 1992 Mar; 43(3):569-614. PubMed ID: 11652106
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. The fetus and the law--whose life is it anyway?
Gallagher J
Ms; 1984 Sep; 13(3):62, 64, 66+. PubMed ID: 11655606
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Pregnant women and the duty to rescue: a feminist response to the fetal rights debate.
Bennett B
Law Context; 1991; 9():70-91. PubMed ID: 11660071
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Prenatal invasions and interventions: what's wrong with fetal rights?
Gallagher J
Harv Womens Law J; 1987; 10():9-58. PubMed ID: 11649954
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Of gametes and guardians: the impropriety of appointing guardians ad litem for fetuses and embryos.
Goldberg S
Wash Law Rev; 1991 Apr; 66(2):503-44. PubMed ID: 11656073
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Apprehending the fetus en ventre sa mere: a study in judicial sleight of hand.
Tateishi SA
Sask Law Rev; 1989; 53(1):113-41. PubMed ID: 11656024
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. "Even by commonsense morality": Morgentaler, Borowski, and the Constitution of Canada.
McConnell ML
Can Bar Rev; 1989 Mar; 68(1):765-96. PubMed ID: 11656020
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Regulating women's bodies: the adverse effect of fetal rights theory on childbirth decisions and women of color.
Krauss DJ
Harv Civ Rights-Civil Lib Law Rev; 1991; 26(2):523-47. PubMed ID: 11652068
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Medicolegal implications of constitutional status for the unborn: "ambulatory chalices" or "priorities and aspirations.
Tolton C
Univ Tor Fac Law Rev; 1988; 47(1):3-57. PubMed ID: 11655976
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Mama vs. fetus.
Hornick HL
Med Trial Tech Q; 1993; 39(4):536-69. PubMed ID: 11659785
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Fetal rights and maternal rights: is there a conflict?
Rogers S
Can J Women Law; 1986; 1(2):456-69. PubMed ID: 11651100
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Unborn child abuse: contemplating legal solution.
Dorczak A
Can J Fam Law; 1991; 9(2):133-56. PubMed ID: 11656494
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
