193 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11656206)
1. Understanding the new politics of abortion: a framework and agenda for research.
Goggin ML
Am Polit Q; 1993 Jan; 21(1):4-30. PubMed ID: 11656206
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Abortion rights in America.
Bullock JR
Brigh Young Univ Law Rev; 1994; 1994(1):63-94. PubMed ID: 11656488
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Political and socioeconomic indicators of state restrictiveness toward abortion.
Strickland RA; Whicker ML
Policy Stud J; 1992; 20(4):598-617. PubMed ID: 11660186
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Abortion and a nation at war.
First Things; 1992 Oct; 26():9-13. PubMed ID: 11659506
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Toward a Thomistic perspective on abortion and the law in contemporary America.
Kaveny MC
Thomist; 1991 Jul; 55(3):343-96. PubMed ID: 11656147
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. The abortion struggle in America.
Warren MA
Bioethics; 1989 Oct; 3(4):320-32. PubMed ID: 11651956
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Abortion politics: writing for an audience of one.
Estrich SR; Sullivan KM
Univ PA Law Rev; 1989 Nov; 138(1):119-55. PubMed ID: 11656496
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. American abortion debate.
Marwick C
BMJ; 1989 Apr; 298(6680):1055-6. PubMed ID: 11644409
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Abortion compromise -- inevitable and impossible.
Law SA
Univ Ill Law Rev; 1992; 25(4):921-41. PubMed ID: 11656296
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Political effects of court decisions on abortion: a comparison between the United States and the German Federal Republic.
George J
Int J Law Fam; 1989 Apr; 3(1):106-36. PubMed ID: 11656044
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Envisioning a future for reproductive liberty: strategies for making the rights real.
Pine RN; Law SA
Harv Civ Rights-Civil Lib Law Rev; 1992; 27(2):407-63. PubMed ID: 11656200
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Feminist litigation: an oxymoron? -- a study of the briefs filed in William L. Webster v. Reproductive Health Services.
Colker R
Harv Womens Law J; 1990; 13():137-88. PubMed ID: 11656053
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. The abortion debate after Webster: the Catholic-American moment.
Maestri WF
Linacre Q; 1990 Feb; 57(1):46-57. PubMed ID: 11651980
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Abortion, toleration, and moral uncertainty.
Strauss DA
Supreme Court Rev; 1992; ():1-28. PubMed ID: 11659887
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Taking aim at Roe v. Wade.
Gorney C
Washington Post; 1989 Apr; ():18-26, 42-44. PubMed ID: 11655908
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. How not to promote serious deliberation about abortion.
McConnell MW
Univ Chic Law Rev; 1991; 58(3):1181-202. PubMed ID: 11656153
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. A legal strategy to overturn Roe v. Wade after Webster: some lessons from Lincoln.
Forsythe CD
Brigh Young Univ Law Rev; 1991; 1991(1):519-60. PubMed ID: 11656174
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Do women legislators matter? Female legislators and state abortion policy.
Berkman MB; O'Connor RE
Am Polit Q; 1993 Jan; 21(1):102-24. PubMed ID: 11656202
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Supreme Court, 5-4, narrowing Roe v. Wade, upholds sharp state limits on abortion.
Greenhouse L; Dionne EJ
N Y Times Web; 1989 Jul; ():1, 10-13. PubMed ID: 11646725
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Webster v. Reproductive Health Services: devaluing the right to choose.
Binion G
Women Polit; 1991; 11(2):41-60. PubMed ID: 11656100
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
