These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
138 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11656209)
21. Abortion still a constitutional issue. Lancet; 1983 Apr; 1(8329):866-7. PubMed ID: 11644255 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. U.S. abortion policy and fertility. Klerman JA Am Enterp; 1999 May; 89(2):261-4. PubMed ID: 11657714 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. The abortion debate after Webster: the Catholic-American moment. Maestri WF Linacre Q; 1990 Feb; 57(1):46-57. PubMed ID: 11651980 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. State constitutions: the new battlefield for abortion rights. Steinschneider J Harv Womens Law J; 1987; 10():284-94. PubMed ID: 11649953 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Groups challenging abortion rules. Lewin T N Y Times Web; 1988 Feb; ():A12. PubMed ID: 11646640 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. A legal strategy to overturn Roe v. Wade after Webster: some lessons from Lincoln. Forsythe CD Brigh Young Univ Law Rev; 1991; 1991(1):519-60. PubMed ID: 11656174 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. The unborn and the born again. New Repub; 1977 Jul; 177(27):5-6+. PubMed ID: 11663777 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Abortion: questions and answers. O'Connor JJ Hum Life Rev; 1990; 16(3):65-96. PubMed ID: 11656272 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. The conservative case for abortion. Muller JZ New Repub; 1995 Aug 21-28; 213(8-9):27-9. PubMed ID: 11656443 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Statutory prohibition on use of appropriated funds in programs where abortion is a method of family planning; standard of compliance for family planning services projects; proposed rules. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Fed Regist; 1987 Sep; 52(169):33210-5. PubMed ID: 11645640 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Little Rock Family Planning Services v. Dalton. U.S. District Court, E.D. Arkansas, Little Rock Division Fed Suppl; 1994 Jul; 860():609-31. PubMed ID: 11648416 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Doe v. Mathews. U.S. District Court, District of Columbia Fed Suppl; 1976 Oct; 422():141-7. PubMed ID: 11648360 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. An H.M.O., Catholic-run, bars coverage for abortions. N Y Times Web; 1997 Nov; ():B5. PubMed ID: 11647528 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. New York v. Sullivan. U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit Fed Report; 1989 Nov; 889():401-18. PubMed ID: 11648392 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Clinton would end ban on aid to poor seeking abortions. Toner R N Y Times Web; 1993 Mar; ():A1, A21. PubMed ID: 11647468 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Clinton orders reversal of abortion restrictions left by Reagan and Bush. Toner R N Y Times Web; 1993 Jan; ():1, 10. PubMed ID: 11647464 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Review of abortion policy: legality, medicaid funding, and parental involvement, 1967-1994. Merz JF; Jackson CA; Klerman JA Womens Rights Law Report; 1995; 17(1):1-61. PubMed ID: 11863033 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Little Rock Family Planning Services v. Dalton; Orr v. Nelson. U.S. Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit Fed Report; 1995 Jul; 60():497-505. PubMed ID: 11648415 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]