These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

585 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11656224)

  • 21. The constitutional morality of abortion.
    Brownstein A; Dau P
    Boston Coll Law Rev; 1992 Jul; 33(4):689-761. PubMed ID: 11656217
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. A thorn in the side of privacy: the need for reassessment of the constitutional right to abortion.
    Kunz KA
    Marquette Law Rev; 1987; 70(3):534-71. PubMed ID: 11655884
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Fischer v. Department of Public Welfare.
    Pennsylvania. Commonwealth Court
    Atl Report; 1984 Sep; 482():1148-62. PubMed ID: 11648341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The selective funding problem: abortions and religious schools.
    McConnell MW
    Harv Law Rev; 1991 Mar; 104(5):989-1050. PubMed ID: 11656068
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The Title X family planning gag rule: can the government buy up constitutional rights?
    Chervin CI
    Stanford Law Rev; 1989 Jan; 41(2):401-34. PubMed ID: 11655926
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Abortion and the right of privacy.
    Ortega ML
    Philipp Law J; 1973; 48(4-5):652-95. PubMed ID: 11663743
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The future of abortion.
    McDaniel A
    Newsweek; 1989 Jul; 114(3):14-21, 24-27. PubMed ID: 11655929
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Rationalizing the abortion debate: legal rhetoric and the abortion controversy.
    Chemerinsky E
    Buffalo Law Rev; 1982; 31(1):107-64. PubMed ID: 11655711
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Constitutional law--abortion funding and the demise of the maternal health consideration--Harris v. McRae, 100 S.Ct. 2671 (1980).
    Libby FA
    Suffolk Univ Law Rev; 1981 Apr; 15(2):285-305. PubMed ID: 11655650
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Abortion laws, religious beliefs and the first amendment.
    Skahn SL
    Valparaiso Univ Law Rev; 1980; 14(3):487-526. PubMed ID: 11664174
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Abortion rights in America.
    Bullock JR
    Brigh Young Univ Law Rev; 1994; 1994(1):63-94. PubMed ID: 11656488
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Abortion and the indigent.
    Altman A
    J Soc Philos; 1980 Jan; 11(1):5-9. PubMed ID: 11655611
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Doe v. Beal: abortion, Medicaid, and equal protection.
    Wilcox JK
    Va Law Rev; 1976 May; 62(4):811-37. PubMed ID: 11663695
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Feminist litigation: an oxymoron? -- a study of the briefs filed in William L. Webster v. Reproductive Health Services.
    Colker R
    Harv Womens Law J; 1990; 13():137-88. PubMed ID: 11656053
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Michigan court voids ban on state-paid abortions.
    N Y Times Web; 1991 Feb; ():B8. PubMed ID: 11647433
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Amendment No. 2413 [(abortion funding[.
    Weicker LP
    Congr Rec (Dly Ed); 1980 Sep; 126(152):S13703-11. PubMed ID: 11664172
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Abortion funding and wise social policy: implications of Harris v. McRae.
    Gold RB
    Women Health; 1980; 5(4):79-83. PubMed ID: 11655640
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Public funding of medically necessary abortions is not required under the Medicaid Act: Harris v. McRae, 100 S.Ct. 2671 (1980).
    Gray AD
    Tex Tech Law Rev; 1981; 12(2):483-99. PubMed ID: 11655635
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Woman, womb, and bodily integrity.
    Neff CL
    Yale J Law Fem; 1991; 3(2):327-53. PubMed ID: 11656226
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The implantation of rights: an argument for unconditionally funded Norplant removal.
    Arnow RS
    Berkeley Womens Law J; 1996; 11():19-48. PubMed ID: 11657484
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 30.