184 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11656267)
1. The center holds!
Dworkin R
New York Rev Books; 1992 Aug; 39(14):29-33. PubMed ID: 11656267
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. The Pennsylvania abortion case.
Benshoof J
Touro Law Rev; 1993; 9(2):217-49. PubMed ID: 11656382
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Judicial supremacy, right-to-life and the abortion decision.
Lindholm LM
Public Aff Q; 1988 Apr; 2(2):1-20. PubMed ID: 11651912
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Privacy II: state attempts to regulate abortion.
Prall S
Annu Surv Am Law; 1988; 1(2):385-427. PubMed ID: 11652657
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania v. Casey: constitutional principles and political turbulence.
Bigel AI
Univ Dayton Law Rev; 1993; 18(3):733-62. PubMed ID: 11659777
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. The Webster amicus curiae briefs: perspectives on the abortion controversy and the role of the Supreme Court -- amici for appellants.
Blaustein AP
Am J Law Med; 1989; 15(2-3):204-33. PubMed ID: 11644397
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Abortion, absolutism, and compromise.
Carter SL
Yale Law J; 1991 Jun; 100(8):2747-66. PubMed ID: 11656152
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. From arguments to Supreme Court opinions in Planned Parenthood v. Casey.
Kassop N
PS (Wash DC); 1993 Mar; 26(1):53-8. PubMed ID: 12085874
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Webster and the future of substantive due process.
Bopp J; Coleson RE
Duquesne Law Rev; 1990; 28(2):271-94. PubMed ID: 11656037
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Roe to Casey: a survey of abortion law.
Pirner RK; Williams LB
Washburn Law J; 1993; 32(2):166-89. PubMed ID: 11659798
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Unraveling compromise.
Olsen F
Harv Law Rev; 1989 Nov; 103(1):105-35. PubMed ID: 11655993
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. The Supreme Court on abortion funding: the second time around.
Horan DJ; Marzen TJ
St Louis Univ Law J; 1981; 25(2):411-27. PubMed ID: 11655812
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. The viability of the trimester approach.
Calder KA
Univ Baltimore Law Rev; 1984; 13(2):322-45. PubMed ID: 11658808
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Thornburgh v. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists: distinguishing abortion regulation from attempted intimidation.
Erato LD
Loyola Law Rev; 1987; 33(2):498-516. PubMed ID: 11655874
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Webster, privacy, and RU486.
Haas EM
J Contemp Health Law Policy; 1990; 6():277-96. PubMed ID: 11645679
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. The battle over abortion.
Salholz E
Newsweek; 1989 May; 113(18):28-32, 34-36, 38. PubMed ID: 11659104
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Abortion's shrinking majority.
Murphy J
Time; 1986 Jun; 127(25):30-1. PubMed ID: 11645638
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Abortion rights of young women: the Supreme Court attacks the most vulnerable.
Heller S
Washburn Law J; 1990; 30(1):15-28. PubMed ID: 11659579
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. How not to promote serious deliberation about abortion.
McConnell MW
Univ Chic Law Rev; 1991; 58(3):1181-202. PubMed ID: 11656153
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Abortion and the Pied Piper of compromise.
Clark AE
N Y Univ Law Rev; 1993 May; 68(2):265-329. PubMed ID: 11656365
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
