These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
3. The law and assisted reproduction in the United Kingdom and United States. Stenger RL J Law Health; 1994-1995; 9(1):135-61. PubMed ID: 11654454 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Lessons learned from Great Britain's Human Fertilization and Embryology Act: should the United States regulate the fate of unused frozen embryos? Kuo L Loyola Los Angel Int Comp Law J; 1997 Aug; 19(4):1027-53. PubMed ID: 11660675 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Assisted noncoital reproduction: a comparative analysis. Smith GP Boston Univ Int Law J; 1990; 8(1):21-52. PubMed ID: 11659376 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Regulating research: a tale of two technologies. Zallen DT Technol Soc; 1989; 11(4):377-86. PubMed ID: 11651309 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Stem cell research: the laws of nations and a proposal for international guidelines. Ayer AC Conn J Int Law; 2002; 17(2):393-428. PubMed ID: 12688299 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act 1990. Great Britain Bull Med Ethics; 1990 Nov; No. 63():13-21. PubMed ID: 11651088 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Diffusion of in-vitro fertilization in the Netherlands and England: an exploratory study. de Wit A; Banta D Int J Technol Aging; 1991; 7(4):574-84. PubMed ID: 11656320 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Intimations of life: extracorporeality and the law. Smith GP Gonzaga Law Rev; 1985-1986; 21(2):395-424. PubMed ID: 11658788 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Embryos and Europe: what prospects for harmonisation? Hornett S New Law J; 1991 May; 141(6505):713-714, 721. PubMed ID: 11659399 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. A review of the third annual meeting of the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology. Burfoot A Reprod Genet Eng; 1988; 1(1):107-11. PubMed ID: 11650377 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Embryo research and fertilisation code. Walker A BMJ; 1991 Mar; 302(6779):746. PubMed ID: 11642876 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act 1990. Great Britain Halsburys Statut Engl G B; 1990 Nov; 38():105-61. PubMed ID: 12041434 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Are British IVF consent forms adequate? Pfeffer N Bull Med Ethics; 1991 Jun; No. 69():28-31. PubMed ID: 11651173 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. The Human Fertilisation and Embryology (Statutory Storage Period for Embryos) Regulations 1996 (S.I. 1996 No. 375). Grubb A Med Law Rev; 1996; 4(2):211-5. PubMed ID: 11655139 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Recommendations on the management of services for in vitro fertilisation from the WHO (regional office for Europe) 1990. World Health Organization BMJ; 1992 Jul; 305(6847):250/251 (unpaged inset). PubMed ID: 11643025 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Doctors warn of loophole in embryo bill. Vines G New Sci; 1990 Mar; 125(1710):21. PubMed ID: 11655980 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Embryo research: British debate under way. Nature; 1989 Nov; 342(6249):463. PubMed ID: 11644395 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Weaving "birth" technology into the "value and policy web" of medicine, ethics and law: should policies on "conception" be consistent? Somerville MA Nova Law Rev; 1989; 13(2):515-608. PubMed ID: 11650354 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]