346 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11656314)
1. From spiritual descriptions to legal prescriptions: religious imagery of women as "fetal container" in the law.
Peach LJ
J Law Relig; 1993-1994; 10(1):73-93. PubMed ID: 11656314
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Fetal protection and freedom of contract.
Paul EF
Public Aff Q; 1992 Jul; 6(3):305-26. PubMed ID: 11652079
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. The fetus and the law--whose life is it anyway?
Gallagher J
Ms; 1984 Sep; 13(3):62, 64, 66+. PubMed ID: 11655606
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. The creation of fetal rights: conflicts with women's constitutional rights to liberty, privacy, and equal protection.
Johnsen DE
Yale Law J; 1986 Jan; 95(3):599-625. PubMed ID: 11658701
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Forced obstetrical intervention: a charter analysis.
Grant I
Univ Tor Law J; 1989; 39(3):217-57. PubMed ID: 11656008
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Shared interests: promoting healthy births without sacrificing women's liberty.
Johnsen D
Hastings Law J; 1992 Mar; 43(3):569-614. PubMed ID: 11652106
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Defining the boundaries of personal privacy: is there a paternal interest in compelling therapeutic fetal surgery?
Blickenstaff DC
Northwest Univ Law Rev; 1994; 88(3):1157-99. PubMed ID: 11656414
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Medical choices during pregnancy: whose decision is it anyway?
Goldberg S
Rutgers Law Rev; 1989; 41(2):591-623. PubMed ID: 11649263
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Pregnant women and the duty to rescue: a feminist response to the fetal rights debate.
Bennett B
Law Context; 1991; 9():70-91. PubMed ID: 11660071
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Regulating women's bodies: the adverse effect of fetal rights theory on childbirth decisions and women of color.
Krauss DJ
Harv Civ Rights-Civil Lib Law Rev; 1991; 26(2):523-47. PubMed ID: 11652068
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Envisioning a future for reproductive liberty: strategies for making the rights real.
Pine RN; Law SA
Harv Civ Rights-Civil Lib Law Rev; 1992; 27(2):407-63. PubMed ID: 11656200
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Court-ordered cesareans: can a pregnant woman refuse?
Leavine BA
Houst Law Rev; 1992; 29(1):185-218. PubMed ID: 11656666
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Mama vs. fetus.
Hornick HL
Med Trial Tech Q; 1993; 39(4):536-69. PubMed ID: 11659785
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Power and procreation: state interference in pregnancy.
Hanigsberg JE
Ottawa Law Rev; 1991; 23(1):35-70. PubMed ID: 11656189
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Of gametes and guardians: the impropriety of appointing guardians ad litem for fetuses and embryos.
Goldberg S
Wash Law Rev; 1991 Apr; 66(2):503-44. PubMed ID: 11656073
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. A feminist response to 'Unborn child abuse: contemplating legal solution.
Dawson TB
Can J Fam Law; 1991; 9(2):157-76. PubMed ID: 11656495
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Women's job rights collide with fears of birth defects.
Kilborn PT
N Y Times Web; 1990 Sep; ():1, 28. PubMed ID: 11646784
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Fetal protection: law, ethics and corporate policy.
Sprotzer I; Goldberg IV
J Bus Ethics; 1992 Oct; 11(10):731-5. PubMed ID: 11652069
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Prenatal invasions and interventions: what's wrong with fetal rights?
Gallagher J
Harv Womens Law J; 1987; 10():9-58. PubMed ID: 11649954
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Procreative liberty and the control of conception, pregnancy, and childbirth.
Robertson JA
Va Law Rev; 1983 Apr; 69(3):405-64. PubMed ID: 11651806
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
