These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
349 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11656345)
1. Law and the regulation of reproduction in Ireland: 1922-1992. Whitty N Univ Tor Law J; 1993; 43(4):851-88. PubMed ID: 11656345 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. "An Irish solution to an Irish problem": Ireland's struggle with abortion law. Weinstein JA Ariz J Int Comp Law; 1993; 10(1):165-200. PubMed ID: 11656312 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. The politics of abortion. Gearty C J Law Soc; 1992; 19(4):441-53. PubMed ID: 11656230 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Abortion and dialogue. Colker R Tulane Law Rev; 1989 Jun; 63(6):1363-403. PubMed ID: 11659218 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. The Irish abortion cases: European limits to national sovereignty? Lawson R Eur J Health Law; 1994; 1(2):167-86. PubMed ID: 11654541 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Irish abortion: seeking refuge in a jurisprudence of doubt and delegation. Fox M; Murphy T J Law Soc; 1992; 19(4):454-66. PubMed ID: 11656231 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Reproductive rights and the Irish Constitution: from the sanctity of life to the sanctity of autonomy? Hanafin P Eur J Health Law; 1996 Jun; 3(2):179-88. PubMed ID: 11654765 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Abortion law in Europe in 1991-1992. Boland R J Law Med Ethics; 1993; 21(1):72-93. PubMed ID: 11652126 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Feminist litigation: an oxymoron? -- a study of the briefs filed in William L. Webster v. Reproductive Health Services. Colker R Harv Womens Law J; 1990; 13():137-88. PubMed ID: 11656053 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Society for the Protection of Unborn Children (Ireland) Ltd. v. Grogan: Irish abortion law and the free movement of services in the European Community. Colvin CM Fordham Int Law J; 1991-1992; 15(2):476-526. PubMed ID: 11656211 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. The inadequacies of Australian abortion law. Cica N Aust J Fam Law; 1991 Mar; 5(1):37-68. PubMed ID: 11656112 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Political effects of court decisions on abortion: a comparison between the United States and the German Federal Republic. George J Int J Law Fam; 1989 Apr; 3(1):106-36. PubMed ID: 11656044 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Terminating abortion rights? Ewing KD; Gearty CA New Law J; 1992 Dec; 142(6579):1696-8. PubMed ID: 11656371 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Abortion and the freedom to travel in the European Economic Community: a perspective on Attorney General v. X. Stoffregen SS New Engl Law Rev; 1993; 28(2):543-76. PubMed ID: 11656448 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Abortion and the right of privacy. Ortega ML Philipp Law J; 1973; 48(4-5):652-95. PubMed ID: 11663743 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Abortion rights in America. Bullock JR Brigh Young Univ Law Rev; 1994; 1994(1):63-94. PubMed ID: 11656488 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. "Even by commonsense morality": Morgentaler, Borowski, and the Constitution of Canada. McConnell ML Can Bar Rev; 1989 Mar; 68(1):765-96. PubMed ID: 11656020 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Notes from the field: a reply to Professor Colker. Burns SE Harv Womens Law J; 1990; 13():189-206. PubMed ID: 11656054 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. The Morgentaler decision: Parliament's options. Hovius B Can Fam Law Q; 1988; 3():137-65. PubMed ID: 11659378 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]