These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
269 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11656347)
1. Hope v. Perales: expanding medically necessary abortion rights of pregnant indigent women under New York and Nebraska state constitutional due process clauses. Brown M Neb Law Rev; 1993; 72(2):586-607. PubMed ID: 11656347 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. The right to Medicaid payment for abortion. Butler PA Hastings Law J; 1977 Mar; 28(4):931-77. PubMed ID: 11663756 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Hope v. Perales. New York. Court of Appeals North East Rep Second Ser; 1994 May; 634():183-8. PubMed ID: 12041237 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. State constitutions as a source of individual liberties: expanding protection for abortion funding under Medicaid. Vuernick R J Contemp Law; 1993; 19(1):185-216. PubMed ID: 11652310 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. The impact of public abortion funding decisions on indigent women: a proposal to reform state statutory and constitutional abortion funding provisions. Corns CA Univ Mich J Law Reform; 1991; 24(2):371-403. PubMed ID: 11656224 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. The right to abortion under Medicaid. Butler PA Clgh Rev; 1974 Apr; 7(12):713-20. PubMed ID: 11663473 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. State limitations upon the availability and accessibility of abortions after Wade and Bolton. Finn J Univ Kans Law Rev; 1976; 25(1):87-107. PubMed ID: 11663734 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. The abortion-funding issue: a study in mixed constitutional cues. Yarbrough TE North Carol Law Rev; 1981 Mar; 59(3):611-27. PubMed ID: 11655747 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Funding of medically-necessary abortions: a reexamination of U.S. law and a call for EC federalism. Nishi J Univ Chic Leg Forum; 1992; [1992]():517-38. PubMed ID: 11652961 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Committee to Defend Reproductive Rights v. Myers: Medi-Cal funding of abortion. Hendrickson E Gold Gate Univ Law Rev; 1978; 9(2):361-419. PubMed ID: 11664072 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Public funding of medically necessary abortions is not required under the Medicaid Act: Harris v. McRae, 100 S.Ct. 2671 (1980). Gray AD Tex Tech Law Rev; 1981; 12(2):483-99. PubMed ID: 11655635 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Constitutional law--denial of state Medicaid funds for abortions not 'medically necessary' does not violate the equal protection clause. Barber CK Howard Law J; 1978; 21(3):937-54. PubMed ID: 11663935 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Doe v. Beal: abortion, Medicaid, and equal protection. Wilcox JK Va Law Rev; 1976 May; 62(4):811-37. PubMed ID: 11663695 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Harris v. McRae: the Court retreats from Roe v. Wade. Brock VM Loyola Law Rev; 1980; 26(3):749-60. PubMed ID: 11664179 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Constitutional law--United States Supreme Court upholds the constitutionality of the Hyde Amendment...--Harris v. McRae, 100 S.Ct. 2671 (1980). Barnett BA Temple Law Q; 1981; 54(1):109-44. PubMed ID: 11655628 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Constitutional law--abortion funding and the demise of the maternal health consideration--Harris v. McRae, 100 S.Ct. 2671 (1980). Libby FA Suffolk Univ Law Rev; 1981 Apr; 15(2):285-305. PubMed ID: 11655650 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Medicaid and the abortion right. Blauner MA George Washington Law Rev; 1976 Mar; 44(3):404-17. PubMed ID: 11662252 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Abortion: state action. Womens Rights Law Report; 1977; 3(3-4):162-9. PubMed ID: 11663757 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Abortion laws, religious beliefs and the first amendment. Skahn SL Valparaiso Univ Law Rev; 1980; 14(3):487-526. PubMed ID: 11664174 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]