These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
122 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11656374)
1. A divisive issue and a divided court: Planned Parenthood v. Casey. Campbell A Oxf J Leg Stud; 1993; 13(4):571-83. PubMed ID: 11656374 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Planned Parenthood v. Casey: the flight from reason in the Supreme Court. Linton PB St Louis Univ Public Law Rev; 1993; 13(1):15-137. PubMed ID: 11656611 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Planned Parenthood v. Casey: the current state of abortion law. Berlin SI Second Opin; 1993 Jan; 18(3):104-9. PubMed ID: 11645221 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Casey, Bray and beyond: religious liberty and the abortion debate. Simmons PD St Louis Univ Public Law Rev; 1993; 13(1):467-88. PubMed ID: 11656618 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Court gets stark arguments on abortion. Greenhouse L N Y Times Web; 1992 Apr; ():A1, B10-11. PubMed ID: 11646254 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Workability of the undue burden test. Schneider EA Temple Law Rev; 1993; 66(3):1003-37. PubMed ID: 11659882 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Abortion politics: writing for an audience of one. Estrich SR; Sullivan KM Univ PA Law Rev; 1989 Nov; 138(1):119-55. PubMed ID: 11656496 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Unenumerated rights: whether and how Roe should be overruled. Dworkin R Univ Chic Law Rev; 1992; 59(1):381-432. PubMed ID: 11656301 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Emancipation as freedom in Roe v. Wade. Bezanson RP Dickinson Law Rev; 1993; 97(3):485-512. PubMed ID: 11656343 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Jane L. v. Bangerter. U.S. District Court, D. Utah, C.D Fed Suppl; 1992 Dec; 809():865-80. PubMed ID: 11648409 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Roe v. Wade: a retrospective look at a judicial oxymoron. Coleman JJ St Louis Univ Law J; 1984 Dec; 29(7):7-44. PubMed ID: 11655813 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Logic, law and abortion. Degnan M; Pannier R Linacre Q; 1992 Feb; 59(1):53-8. PubMed ID: 11652613 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania v. Casey: constitutional principles and political turbulence. Bigel AI Univ Dayton Law Rev; 1993; 18(3):733-62. PubMed ID: 11659777 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Planned Parenthood v. Casey: the role of stare decisis. Laird V Mod Law Rev; 1994 May; 57(3):461-7. PubMed ID: 11656439 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. High Court, 5-4, affirms right to abortion but allows most of Pennsylvania's limits. Greenhouse L N Y Times Web; 1992 Jun; ():A1, A15-17. PubMed ID: 11647923 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. The Supreme Court, the "facts of life" and "the thoughtful part of the nation. Destro RA Hum Life Rev; 1994; 20(3):28-48. PubMed ID: 11656359 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]