These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

227 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11656376)

  • 1. Ethical triumph, or surgical rape?
    Hewson B
    Solicit J; 1993 Nov; 137(45):1182-3. PubMed ID: 11656376
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Jehovah's Witnesses, pregnancy, and blood transfusions: a paradigm for the autonomy rights of all pregnant women.
    Levy JK
    J Law Med Ethics; 1999; 27(2):171-89. PubMed ID: 11657465
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Jehovah's Witnesses and blood transfusion.
    Watson SB
    Clin Ethics Rep; 1991; 5(1):1-16. PubMed ID: 11653954
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Refusal of treatment and the competent patient.
    Grubb A
    Eur J Health Law; 1994; 1(4):367-75. PubMed ID: 11654544
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Consent to medical treatment: the law and ethics.
    Balcombe LJ
    Trans Med Soc Lond; 1993-1994; 110():34-5. PubMed ID: 11660795
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Blood transfusions, Jehovah's Witnesses and the rule of inviolability of the human body.
    Kouri RP
    Rev Droit; 1974; 5():156-76. PubMed ID: 11662988
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Statutory recognition of the right to die: the California Natural Death Act.
    Flannery EJ
    Boston Univ Law Rev; 1977 Jan; 57(1):148-77. PubMed ID: 11664705
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Contemporary transatlantic developments concerning compelled medical treatment of pregnant women.
    Rossiter GP
    Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 1995 May; 35(2):132-8. PubMed ID: 7677674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. In re A.C.: a court-ordered cesarean becomes precedent for nonconsensual organ harvesting.
    Sturgess RH
    Nova Law Rev; 1989; 13(2):649-69. PubMed ID: 11650356
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The judge in the delivery room: the emergence of court-ordered cesareans.
    Rhoden NK
    Calif Law Rev; 1986 Dec; 74(6):1951-2030. PubMed ID: 11658950
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Forced cesarean sections: do the ends justify the means?
    Drigotas EE
    North Carol Law Rev; 1991 Nov; 70(1):297-321. PubMed ID: 11651652
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The constitutionality of court-ordered cesarean surgery: a threshold question.
    Levine EM
    Albany Law J Sci Technol; 1994; 4(2):229-309. PubMed ID: 12091921
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The approach to the Jehovah's Witness patient.
    Rothenberg DM
    Anesthesiol Clin North Am; 1990 Sep; 8(3):589-607. PubMed ID: 11653928
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Their life is in the blood: Jehovah's Witnesses, blood transfusions and the courts.
    Moore ML
    North KY Law Rev; 1983; 10(2):281-304. PubMed ID: 11649715
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Deciding for others.
    Montgomery J
    Bull Med Ethics; 1999 May; No. 148():18-20. PubMed ID: 11657982
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. From cannibalism to caesareans: two conceptions of fundamental rights.
    Hasnas J
    Northwest Univ Law Rev; 1995; 89(3):900-41. PubMed ID: 11660128
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Compulsory medical treatment of adults.
    Riga PJ
    Cathol Lawyer; 1976; 22(2):105-37. PubMed ID: 11664685
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. When parents refuse consent to medical care for their children: the role of the nurse.
    Garey CC;
    Child Leg Rights J; 1996; 16(1):11-6. PubMed ID: 11655110
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Court says doctors were right to treat Jehovah's Witness.
    Dyer C
    BMJ; 1992 Aug; 305(6848):272. PubMed ID: 11643026
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. In re Brown.
    Illinois. Appellate Court, First District, Fifth Division
    North East Rep Second Ser; 1997 Dec; 689():397-406. PubMed ID: 12041238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.