These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. Jehovah's Witnesses, pregnancy, and blood transfusions: a paradigm for the autonomy rights of all pregnant women. Levy JK J Law Med Ethics; 1999; 27(2):171-89. PubMed ID: 11657465 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Refusal of treatment and the competent patient. Grubb A Eur J Health Law; 1994; 1(4):367-75. PubMed ID: 11654544 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Consent to medical treatment: the law and ethics. Balcombe LJ Trans Med Soc Lond; 1993-1994; 110():34-5. PubMed ID: 11660795 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Blood transfusions, Jehovah's Witnesses and the rule of inviolability of the human body. Kouri RP Rev Droit; 1974; 5():156-76. PubMed ID: 11662988 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Statutory recognition of the right to die: the California Natural Death Act. Flannery EJ Boston Univ Law Rev; 1977 Jan; 57(1):148-77. PubMed ID: 11664705 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Contemporary transatlantic developments concerning compelled medical treatment of pregnant women. Rossiter GP Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 1995 May; 35(2):132-8. PubMed ID: 7677674 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. In re A.C.: a court-ordered cesarean becomes precedent for nonconsensual organ harvesting. Sturgess RH Nova Law Rev; 1989; 13(2):649-69. PubMed ID: 11650356 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. The judge in the delivery room: the emergence of court-ordered cesareans. Rhoden NK Calif Law Rev; 1986 Dec; 74(6):1951-2030. PubMed ID: 11658950 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Forced cesarean sections: do the ends justify the means? Drigotas EE North Carol Law Rev; 1991 Nov; 70(1):297-321. PubMed ID: 11651652 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. The constitutionality of court-ordered cesarean surgery: a threshold question. Levine EM Albany Law J Sci Technol; 1994; 4(2):229-309. PubMed ID: 12091921 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. The approach to the Jehovah's Witness patient. Rothenberg DM Anesthesiol Clin North Am; 1990 Sep; 8(3):589-607. PubMed ID: 11653928 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Their life is in the blood: Jehovah's Witnesses, blood transfusions and the courts. Moore ML North KY Law Rev; 1983; 10(2):281-304. PubMed ID: 11649715 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. From cannibalism to caesareans: two conceptions of fundamental rights. Hasnas J Northwest Univ Law Rev; 1995; 89(3):900-41. PubMed ID: 11660128 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Compulsory medical treatment of adults. Riga PJ Cathol Lawyer; 1976; 22(2):105-37. PubMed ID: 11664685 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. When parents refuse consent to medical care for their children: the role of the nurse. Garey CC; Child Leg Rights J; 1996; 16(1):11-6. PubMed ID: 11655110 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Court says doctors were right to treat Jehovah's Witness. Dyer C BMJ; 1992 Aug; 305(6848):272. PubMed ID: 11643026 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. In re Brown. Illinois. Appellate Court, First District, Fifth Division North East Rep Second Ser; 1997 Dec; 689():397-406. PubMed ID: 12041238 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]