These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
288 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11656382)
1. The Pennsylvania abortion case. Benshoof J Touro Law Rev; 1993; 9(2):217-49. PubMed ID: 11656382 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. The center holds! Dworkin R New York Rev Books; 1992 Aug; 39(14):29-33. PubMed ID: 11656267 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Killing "the handicapped" -- before and after birth. Field MA Harv Womens Law J; 1993; 16():79-138. PubMed ID: 11652872 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. From arguments to Supreme Court opinions in Planned Parenthood v. Casey. Kassop N PS (Wash DC); 1993 Mar; 26(1):53-8. PubMed ID: 12085874 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Toward a First Amendment theory of doctor-patient discourse and the right to receive unbiased medical advice. Berg P Boston Univ Law Rev; 1994 Mar; 74(2):201-66. PubMed ID: 11659979 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Informed consent to abortion: a refinement. Jipping TL Case West Reserve Law Rev; 1987-1988 Winter; 38(3):329-86. PubMed ID: 11659038 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. The future of abortion. McDaniel A Newsweek; 1989 Jul; 114(3):14-21, 24-27. PubMed ID: 11655929 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Unburdening the undue burden standard: orienting Casey in constitutional jurisprudence. Metzger GE Columbia Law Rev; 1994; 94():2025-89. PubMed ID: 11660149 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. High Court, 5-4, affirms right to abortion but allows most of Pennsylvania's limits. Greenhouse L N Y Times Web; 1992 Jun; ():A1, A15-17. PubMed ID: 11647923 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania v. Casey: constitutional principles and political turbulence. Bigel AI Univ Dayton Law Rev; 1993; 18(3):733-62. PubMed ID: 11659777 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. The right of privacy and restraints on abortion under the "undue burden" test: a jurisprudential comparison of Planned Parenthood v. Casey with European practice and Italian law. Ross CS Indiana Int Comp Law Rev; 1993; 3():199-231. PubMed ID: 12091926 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Abortion: are medicine and the law on a collision course? Pollner F Med World News; 1985 Jul; 26(13):66-68, 70, 73+. PubMed ID: 11645557 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Thornburgh v. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists: distinguishing abortion regulation from attempted intimidation. Erato LD Loyola Law Rev; 1987; 33(2):498-516. PubMed ID: 11655874 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Criminal abortion revisited. Buell SW N Y Univ Law Rev; 1991 Dec; 66(6):1774-831. PubMed ID: 11652642 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Judicial supremacy, right-to-life and the abortion decision. Lindholm LM Public Aff Q; 1988 Apr; 2(2):1-20. PubMed ID: 11651912 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. American abortion law applied to new reproductive technology. Hemphill L Jurimetrics; 1992; 32(3):361-86. PubMed ID: 11656220 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Burying the dead: the case against revival of pre-Roe and pre-Casey abortion statutes in a post-Casey world. Scott TL Rev Law Soc Change; 1991-1992; 19(2):355-89. PubMed ID: 11656256 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. How rights are infringed: the role of undue burden analysis in constitutional doctrine. Brownstein A Hastings Law J; 1994 Apr; 45(4):867-959. PubMed ID: 11656422 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Informed consent civil actions for post-abortion psychological trauma. Eller TR Notre Dame Law Rev; 1996; 71(4):639-70. PubMed ID: 11660407 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]