These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
262 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11656384)
1. Legitimacy and the empowerment of discretionary legal authority: the United States Supreme Court and abortion rights. Tyler TR; Mitchell G Duke Law J; 1994 Feb; 43(4):703-815. PubMed ID: 11656384 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. How not to promote serious deliberation about abortion. McConnell MW Univ Chic Law Rev; 1991; 58(3):1181-202. PubMed ID: 11656153 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Abortion, absolutism, and compromise. Carter SL Yale Law J; 1991 Jun; 100(8):2747-66. PubMed ID: 11656152 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Republican schoolmaster: the U.S. Supreme Court, public opinion, and abortion. Franklin CH; Kosaki LC Am Polit Sci Rev; 1989 Sep; 83(3):751-71. PubMed ID: 11656011 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. The gap between law and moral order: an examination of the legitimacy of the Supreme Court abortion decisions. Wardle LD Brigh Young Univ Law Rev; 1980; 1980(4):811-35. PubMed ID: 11655721 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. The class conflict over abortion. Skerry P Public Interest; 1978; (52):. PubMed ID: 11663974 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Some sociological and psychological reflections on the abortion decisions. Ryle EJ Jurist; 1973; 33(2):218-29. PubMed ID: 11663433 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. The Supreme Court's abortion decisions: some observations on the exercise of judicial review in the United States. Grossman JB Sven Juristtidn; 1973; 58(6-7):449-62. PubMed ID: 11663642 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Tribe's judicious feminism -- Abortion: The Clash of Absolutes. Allen AL Stanford Law Rev; 1991 Nov; 44(1):179-203. PubMed ID: 11659573 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Abortion rights of young women: the Supreme Court attacks the most vulnerable. Heller S Washburn Law J; 1990; 30(1):15-28. PubMed ID: 11659579 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. The abortion decision: two years later. More Christian than its critics. Decker RG Commonweal; 1975 Feb; 101(14):384-388+. PubMed ID: 11663610 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. A backdoor to policy making: the use of philosophers by the Supreme Court. Rao N Univ Chic Law Rev; 1998; 65(4):1371-401. PubMed ID: 16273694 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. From arguments to Supreme Court opinions in Planned Parenthood v. Casey. Kassop N PS (Wash DC); 1993 Mar; 26(1):53-8. PubMed ID: 12085874 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Supreme Court and social change: the case of abortion. Kemp KA; Carp RA; Brady DW West Polit Q; 1978 Mar; 31(1):19-31. PubMed ID: 11663893 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Legal aspects of abortion. Polsky S Semin Psychiatry; 1970 Aug; 2(3):246-57. PubMed ID: 5527394 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. The battle over abortion. Salholz E Newsweek; 1989 May; 113(18):28-32, 34-36, 38. PubMed ID: 11659104 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. The abortion cases: a study in law and social change. Rubin ER North Carol Centr Law J; 1974; 5(2):215-53. PubMed ID: 11663476 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Two precipices, one chasm: the economics of physician-assisted suicide and euthanasia. Lund N Hastings Constit Law Q; 1997; 24(4):903-46. PubMed ID: 11657287 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. What Americans really think about abortion. Hunter JD First Things; 1992; 24():13-21. PubMed ID: 11656164 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Life and death in tendency land. Sobran J Hum Life Rev; 1982; 8(3):8-18. PubMed ID: 11651680 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]