These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

262 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11656384)

  • 21. The Supreme Court's abortion rulings and social change.
    Brady DW; Kemp K
    Soc Sci Q; 1976 Dec; 57(3):535-46. PubMed ID: 11663700
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Parents' rights vs. minors' rights regarding the provision of contraceptives to teenagers.
    Wardle LD
    Neb Law Rev; 1989; 68(1-2):216-60. PubMed ID: 11659270
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Abortion: a misplaced debate.
    Brockway AR
    Engage Soc Action; 1974 Feb; 2(2):33-47. PubMed ID: 11663497
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Abortion, precedent, and the Constitution: a comment on Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania v. Casey.
    Maltz EM
    Notre Dame Law Rev; 1992; 68(1):11-32. PubMed ID: 11656531
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. After Roe v. Wade: 10 years' conflict over abortion.
    Peterson B; Barbash F; Russell C
    Washington Post; 1983 Jan; ():A1, A12-13. PubMed ID: 11647346
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The pressure of precedent: a critique of the conservative approaches to stare decisis in abortion cases.
    Gerhardt MJ
    Const Comment; 1993; 10():67-86. PubMed ID: 11656273
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Doctors, patients and the Constitution: a theoretical analysis of the physician's role in "private" reproductive decisions.
    Appleton SF
    Wash Univ Law Q; 1985; 63(2):183-236. PubMed ID: 11656658
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Beyond the Roe debate: judicial experience with the 1980's "reasonableness" test.
    Farber DA; Nowak JE
    Va Law Rev; 1990 Apr; 76(3):519-38. PubMed ID: 11659370
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Political and socioeconomic indicators of state restrictiveness toward abortion.
    Strickland RA; Whicker ML
    Policy Stud J; 1992; 20(4):598-617. PubMed ID: 11660186
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The judicial portrayal of the physician in abortion and sterilization decisions: the use and abuse of medical discretion.
    Asaro A
    Harv Womens Law J; 1983; 6(1):51-102. PubMed ID: 11658431
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Privacy and contraception in the American and Irish constitutions.
    Burt RA
    St Louis Univ Public Law Rev; 1988; 7(2):287-96. PubMed ID: 11659154
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Roe! Doe! Where are you?: the effect of the Supreme Court's abortion decisions.
    Satris MJ
    Univ Calif Davis Law Rev; 1974; 7():432-56. PubMed ID: 11661108
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Massachusetts parental/judicial consent law for minors' abortions: perspectives on the past, present, and future.
    Joseph MA
    New Engl Law Rev; 1992; 26(3):1051-99. PubMed ID: 11659665
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Abortion and the Supreme Court: some are more equal than others.
    Segers MC
    Hastings Cent Rep; 1977 Aug; 7(4):5-6. PubMed ID: 330461
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Amendment No. 336.
    Bartlett DF
    Congr Rec (Dly Ed); 1975 Apr; 121(55):S5708-30. PubMed ID: 11663619
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Informed consent to abortion: a refinement.
    Jipping TL
    Case West Reserve Law Rev; 1987-1988 Winter; 38(3):329-86. PubMed ID: 11659038
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Toward a more perfect union: a federal cause of action for physician aid-in-dying.
    Robichaud TD
    Univ Mich J Law Reform; 1994; 27(2):521-64. PubMed ID: 11656405
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The future of euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide: beyond rights talk to informed public policy.
    Emanuel EJ
    Minn Law Rev; 1998 Apr; 82(4):983-1014. PubMed ID: 11865919
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Parental involvement in adolescent abortion decisions: a legal and psychological critique.
    Embree MG; Dobson TA
    Law Inequal; 1991 Dec; 10(1):53-79. PubMed ID: 11659634
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. H.L. v. Matheson and the right of minors to seek abortions.
    Wolff MH; Hawn RH
    Calif West Law Rev; 1982; 19(1):74-106. PubMed ID: 11658632
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.