These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
224 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11656410)
1. Up against eugenics: disabled women's challenge to receive reproductive health services. Waxman BF Sex Disabil; 1994; 12(2):155-71. PubMed ID: 11656410 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Reproductive technologies and the law: Norplant and the bad mother. Young ME Marriage Fam Rev; 1995; 21(3-4):259-81. PubMed ID: 11654845 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Against selection of human life -- people with disabilities oppose genetic counselling. Waldschmidt A Issues Reprod Genet Eng; 1992; 5(2):155-67. PubMed ID: 11653997 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Reproductive freedoms and African American women. Rutherford C Yale J Law Fem; 1992; 4(2):255-90. PubMed ID: 11656355 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Consent, coercion and consortium: the sexual politics of sterilisation. Kingdom E J Law Soc; 1985; 12(1):19-34. PubMed ID: 11658875 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. International protection of women's reproductive rights. Cook RJ N Y Univ J Int Law Polit; 1992; 24(2):645-727. PubMed ID: 11656212 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. A view towards women's reproductive rights perspective on selected laws and policies in Pakistan. Rahman A Whittier Law Rev; 1994; 15(4):981-1001. PubMed ID: 11659940 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Class, race, and poverty: medical technologies and socio-political choices. Bernier BL Harv Blacklett Law J; 1994; 11():115-43. PubMed ID: 11656593 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Norplant meets the new eugenicists: the impermissibility of coerced contraception. Mertus J; Heller S St Louis Univ Public Law Rev; 1992; 11(2):359-83. PubMed ID: 11652703 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. The reproduction of America. Rudy K J Med Humanit; 1994; 15(4):201-15. PubMed ID: 11645894 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Choices and rights: eugenics, genetics and disability equality. Shakespeare T Disabil Soc; 1998 Nov; 13(5):665-81. PubMed ID: 11660717 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Population policies and the ideology of population control in India. Nair S Issues Reprod Genet Eng; 1992; 5(3):237-52. PubMed ID: 11651476 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Involuntary sterilization of mentally disabled women. Cepko R Berkeley Womens Law J; 1993; 8():122-65. PubMed ID: 11659702 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Women's health: an ethical perspective. Macklin R J Law Med Ethics; 1993; 21(1):23-9. PubMed ID: 11652119 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effect of the Human Genome Initiative on women's rights and reproductive decisions. Charo RA Fetal Diagn Ther; 1993 Apr; 8(Suppl. 1):148-59. PubMed ID: 11653014 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Female self-determination between feminist claims and 'voluntary' eugenics, between 'rights' and ethics. Degener T Issues Reprod Genet Eng; 1990; 3(2):87-99. PubMed ID: 11650920 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Envisioning a future for reproductive liberty: strategies for making the rights real. Pine RN; Law SA Harv Civ Rights-Civil Lib Law Rev; 1992; 27(2):407-63. PubMed ID: 11656200 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Abortion through a feminist ethics lens. Sherwin S Dialogue Can Philos Assoc; 1991; 30():327-42. PubMed ID: 11656379 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Industrial capitalism's hostility to childbirth, responsible childbearing, and eugenic reproductive policies in the first third of the 20th Century. Zimmermann S Issues Reprod Genet Eng; 1990; 3(3):191-200. PubMed ID: 11650962 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. The eugenic and racist premise of reproductive rights and population control. Akhter F Issues Reprod Genet Eng; 1992; 5(1):1-8. PubMed ID: 11651329 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]