These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
366 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11656422)
1. How rights are infringed: the role of undue burden analysis in constitutional doctrine. Brownstein A Hastings Law J; 1994 Apr; 45(4):867-959. PubMed ID: 11656422 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Workability of the undue burden test. Schneider EA Temple Law Rev; 1993; 66(3):1003-37. PubMed ID: 11659882 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Reading Casey: structuring the woman's decisionmaking process. Goldstein RD William Mary Bill Rights J; 1996; 4(3):787-880. PubMed ID: 11660789 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania v. Casey: constitutional principles and political turbulence. Bigel AI Univ Dayton Law Rev; 1993; 18(3):733-62. PubMed ID: 11659777 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania v. Casey: the reaffirmation of Roe or the beginning of the end? Henry KS Univ Louisv J Fam Law; 1993-1994 Winter; 32(1):93-113. PubMed ID: 11660011 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Planned Parenthood v. Casey: the current state of abortion law. Berlin SI Second Opin; 1993 Jan; 18(3):104-9. PubMed ID: 11645221 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. The Supreme Court, the "facts of life" and "the thoughtful part of the nation. Destro RA Hum Life Rev; 1994; 20(3):28-48. PubMed ID: 11656359 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Planned Parenthood v. Casey: the death of repose in reproductive decisionmaking. Nivala J Const Law J; 1993; 4(1):47-95. PubMed ID: 12083095 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Planned Parenthood v. Casey: the flight from reason in the Supreme Court. Linton PB St Louis Univ Public Law Rev; 1993; 13(1):15-137. PubMed ID: 11656611 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. High Court, 5-4, affirms right to abortion but allows most of Pennsylvania's limits. Greenhouse L N Y Times Web; 1992 Jun; ():A1, A15-17. PubMed ID: 11647923 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania v. Casey. U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit Fed Report; 1991 Oct; 947():682-727. PubMed ID: 11648596 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Reproduction and the law. Erickson NS Med Trial Tech Q; 1985; 32(2):165-74. PubMed ID: 11649200 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Abortion and the consideration of fundamental, irreconcilable interests. Jones CJ Syracuse Law Rev; 1982; 33(2):565-613. PubMed ID: 11658668 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Casey, Bray and beyond: religious liberty and the abortion debate. Simmons PD St Louis Univ Public Law Rev; 1993; 13(1):467-88. PubMed ID: 11656618 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. A thorn in the side of privacy: the need for reassessment of the constitutional right to abortion. Kunz KA Marquette Law Rev; 1987; 70(3):534-71. PubMed ID: 11655884 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Where privacy fails: equal protection and the abortion rights of minors. Schmidt CG N Y Univ Law Rev; 1993 Jun; 68(3):597-638. PubMed ID: 11659822 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania v. Casey. U.S. Supreme Court Wests Supreme Court Report; 1992 Jun; 112():2791-885. PubMed ID: 12041291 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Emancipation as freedom in Roe v. Wade. Bezanson RP Dickinson Law Rev; 1993; 97(3):485-512. PubMed ID: 11656343 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Abortion and a nation at war. First Things; 1992 Oct; 26():9-13. PubMed ID: 11659506 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Abortion compromise -- inevitable and impossible. Law SA Univ Ill Law Rev; 1992; 25(4):921-41. PubMed ID: 11656296 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]