These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

220 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11656483)

  • 1. Reproductive responsibilities: rethinking the fetal rights debate.
    Burtt S
    Policy Sci; 1994; 27(2-3):179-96. PubMed ID: 11656483
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Rethinking (m)otherhood: feminist theory and state regulation of pregnancy.
    Harv Law Rev; 1990 Apr; 103(6):1325-43. PubMed ID: 11656270
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Pregnant women and the duty to rescue: a feminist response to the fetal rights debate.
    Bennett B
    Law Context; 1991; 9():70-91. PubMed ID: 11660071
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The creation of fetal rights: conflicts with women's constitutional rights to liberty, privacy, and equal protection.
    Johnsen DE
    Yale Law J; 1986 Jan; 95(3):599-625. PubMed ID: 11658701
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Power and procreation: state interference in pregnancy.
    Hanigsberg JE
    Ottawa Law Rev; 1991; 23(1):35-70. PubMed ID: 11656189
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A feminist response to 'Unborn child abuse: contemplating legal solution.
    Dawson TB
    Can J Fam Law; 1991; 9(2):157-76. PubMed ID: 11656495
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Procreative liberty and the control of conception, pregnancy, and childbirth.
    Robertson JA
    Va Law Rev; 1983 Apr; 69(3):405-64. PubMed ID: 11651806
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Shared interests: promoting healthy births without sacrificing women's liberty.
    Johnsen D
    Hastings Law J; 1992 Mar; 43(3):569-614. PubMed ID: 11652106
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A delicate condition.
    Andrews LB
    Stud Lawyer; 1985 May; 13(9):30-6. PubMed ID: 11649782
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The search for coherence in reproductive policy.
    Merz JF
    J Leg Med; 1996 Mar; 17(1):169-76. PubMed ID: 11644847
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Of gametes and guardians: the impropriety of appointing guardians ad litem for fetuses and embryos.
    Goldberg S
    Wash Law Rev; 1991 Apr; 66(2):503-44. PubMed ID: 11656073
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The troubling question of 'fetal rights': should denying care to the unborn be a crime?
    Begley S; Wingert P; Huck J; Quade V
    Newsweek; 1986 Dec; 108(23):87. PubMed ID: 11653763
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Abortion rights in America.
    Bullock JR
    Brigh Young Univ Law Rev; 1994; 1994(1):63-94. PubMed ID: 11656488
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Regulating women's bodies: the adverse effect of fetal rights theory on childbirth decisions and women of color.
    Krauss DJ
    Harv Civ Rights-Civil Lib Law Rev; 1991; 26(2):523-47. PubMed ID: 11652068
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A new crime, fetal neglect: state intervention to protect the unborn--protection at what cost?
    Manson R; Marolt J
    Calif West Law Rev; 1987-1988; 24(1):161-82. PubMed ID: 11650070
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The judge in the delivery room: the emergence of court-ordered cesareans.
    Rhoden NK
    Calif Law Rev; 1986 Dec; 74(6):1951-2030. PubMed ID: 11658950
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Abortion rights: taking responsibilities more seriously than Dworkin.
    Trakman LE; Gatien S
    SMU Law Rev; 1995; 48(3):585-608. PubMed ID: 11660800
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Medical decision making during a surrogate pregnancy.
    Mayo TW
    Houst Law Rev; 1988 May; 25(3):599-644. PubMed ID: 11649257
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Forced medical treatment of pregnant women: "compelling each to live as seems good to the rest.
    Nelson LJ; Buggy BP; Weil CJ
    Hastings Law J; 1986 May; 37(5):703-63. PubMed ID: 11655855
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Two patients or one? Problems of consent in obstetrics.
    Miller L
    Med Law Int; 1993; 1(1):97-112. PubMed ID: 11659741
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.