641 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11656491)
21. Toward a new analysis of the abortion debate.
Bell KL
Ariz Law Rev; 1991; 33(4):907-35. PubMed ID: 11656167
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. Abortion law reform in France.
Stetson DM
J Comp Fam Stud; 1986; 17(3):277-90. PubMed ID: 11655823
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. An international human right to reproductive health care: toward definition and accountability.
Rahman A; Pine RN
Health Hum Rights; 1995; 1(4):400-27. PubMed ID: 10393795
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. A womb of one's own: the real population problem.
Hartmann B
Sci People; 1987; 19(4):9-12. PubMed ID: 11655839
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Abortion as a social problem: the construction of "opposite" solutions in Sweden and the United States.
Linders A
Soc Probl; 1998 Nov; 45(4):488-509. PubMed ID: 11657705
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Simmering abortion debate goes public in Brazil.
Serbin K
Christ Century; 1995 Mar; 112(8):266-71. PubMed ID: 11660015
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Abortion: state action.
Womens Rights Law Report; 1977; 3(3-4):162-9. PubMed ID: 11663757
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Resolving the abortion debate: compromise legislation, an analysis of the abortion policies of the United States, France and Germany.
Hertberg BL
Suffolk Transnatl Law R; 1993; 16(2):513-70. PubMed ID: 11659765
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Abortion laws: comparative and feminist perspectives in Australia, England and the United States.
Petersen K
Med Law Int; 1996; 2(2):77-105. PubMed ID: 11657551
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Abortion laws and the abortion situation in India.
Karkal M
Issues Reprod Genet Eng; 1991; 4(3):223-30. PubMed ID: 11651217
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. RU 486 in the United States and Great Britain: a case study in gender bias.
Chicoine D
Boston College Int Comp Law Rev; 1993; 16(1):81-113. PubMed ID: 11656262
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. A view towards women's reproductive rights perspective on selected laws and policies in Pakistan.
Rahman A
Whittier Law Rev; 1994; 15(4):981-1001. PubMed ID: 11659940
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Doctors, patients and the Constitution: a theoretical analysis of the physician's role in "private" reproductive decisions.
Appleton SF
Wash Univ Law Q; 1985; 63(2):183-236. PubMed ID: 11656658
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Legal implications of the world population plan of action.
Lee LT
J Int Law Econ; 1974 Dec; 9(3):375-417. PubMed ID: 11663648
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. The right of privacy and restraints on abortion under the "undue burden" test: a jurisprudential comparison of Planned Parenthood v. Casey with European practice and Italian law.
Ross CS
Indiana Int Comp Law Rev; 1993; 3():199-231. PubMed ID: 12091926
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Strengthening human rights, in particular the freedom of choice for women in matters relating to sexual behaviour and reproduction.
Zielinska E; Plakwicz J
J Int Bioethique; 1992 Dec; 3(4):243-51. PubMed ID: 11651416
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. The unborn and the born again.
New Repub; 1977 Jul; 177(27):5-6+. PubMed ID: 11663777
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Abortion alert.
Steinem G
Ms; 1977 Nov; 6(5):118. PubMed ID: 11663979
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Abortion and the law: questions for feminism.
Menon N
Can J Women Law; 1993; 6(1):103-18. PubMed ID: 11659745
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. Reflections on abortion: a roll of the dice in Louisiana.
Colker R
SMU Law Rev; 1992; 46():47-55. PubMed ID: 11656276
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
