181 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11656503)
1. Psychological and legal issues in minors' rights to abortion.
Pliner AJ; Yates S
J Soc Issues; 1992; 48(3):203-16. PubMed ID: 11656503
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Easing restrictions on minors' abortion rights.
O'Keeffe J; Jones JM
Issues Sci Technol; 1990; 7(4):74-80. PubMed ID: 11659333
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Massachusetts parental/judicial consent law for minors' abortions: perspectives on the past, present, and future.
Joseph MA
New Engl Law Rev; 1992; 26(3):1051-99. PubMed ID: 11659665
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Parental involvement in adolescent abortion decisions: a legal and psychological critique.
Embree MG; Dobson TA
Law Inequal; 1991 Dec; 10(1):53-79. PubMed ID: 11659634
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Where privacy fails: equal protection and the abortion rights of minors.
Schmidt CG
N Y Univ Law Rev; 1993 Jun; 68(3):597-638. PubMed ID: 11659822
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Abortion: a new round.
Greenhouse L
N Y Times Web; 1989 Nov; ():A1, A24. PubMed ID: 11647875
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Abortions for minors after Bellotti II: an analysis of state law and a proposal.
Lozano GD
St Marys Law J; 1980; 11(4):946-97. PubMed ID: 11658462
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Workability of the undue burden test.
Schneider EA
Temple Law Rev; 1993; 66(3):1003-37. PubMed ID: 11659882
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Parents' rights vs. minors' rights regarding the provision of contraceptives to teenagers.
Wardle LD
Neb Law Rev; 1989; 68(1-2):216-60. PubMed ID: 11659270
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. When is a pregnant minor mature? When is an abortion in her best interests? The Ohio Supreme Court applies Ohio's Abortion Parental Notification Law: In re Jane Doe 1.
Stuhlbarg SF
Univ Cincinnati Law Rev; 1992; 60(3):907-61. PubMed ID: 11651633
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Reading Casey: structuring the woman's decisionmaking process.
Goldstein RD
William Mary Bill Rights J; 1996; 4(3):787-880. PubMed ID: 11660789
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Beyond the Roe debate: judicial experience with the 1980's "reasonableness" test.
Farber DA; Nowak JE
Va Law Rev; 1990 Apr; 76(3):519-38. PubMed ID: 11659370
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Justices deadlocked on state laws restricting minors' access to abortion.
Taylor S
N Y Times Web; 1987 Dec; ():B16. PubMed ID: 11646635
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Minors' rights to confidential contraceptive services: the limits of state power.
Paul EW; Klassel D
Womens Rights Law Report; 1987; 10(1):45-63. PubMed ID: 11658948
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. For minors, abortion limits have side effects.
Diesenhouse S
N Y Times Web; 1989 Mar; ():E7. PubMed ID: 11647864
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Abortion--an update.
Guthman HL
Med Trial Tech Q; 1985; 32(2):175-91. PubMed ID: 11649201
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Unemancipated minors' rights of access to contraceptives without parental consent or notice--the squeal rule and beyond.
Best M
Oklahoma City Univ Law Rev; 1983; 8(2):219-50. PubMed ID: 11658756
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Schools and abortion: a new debate.
Terry D
N Y Times Web; 1991 Mar; ():A16. PubMed ID: 11646105
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. The impact of state abortion restrictions on minors' demand for abortions.
Haas-Wilson D
J Hum Resour; 1996; 31(1):140-58. PubMed ID: 11660452
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Parental notification and abortion: a review and recommendation to West Virginia's legislature.
Frame DW
West VA Law Rev; 1983; 85(5):943-68. PubMed ID: 11658585
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
