270 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11656566)
1. Responsible animal research: a riff of Rs.
Rowan A; Goldberg A
Altern Lab Anim; 1995; 23(3):306-11. PubMed ID: 11656566
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Ethics and animals.
Zak S
Atl Mon; 1989 Mar; 263(3):68-74. PubMed ID: 11659112
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. One hundred years of animal welfare regulation and of experiments with animals in Germany, effects and reasons.
Gärtner K
Acta Physiol Scand; 1986; 128(Suppl. 554):106-13. PubMed ID: 11649990
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Ethical principles and guidelines for scientific experiments on animals.
;
Altern Lab Anim; 1997; 25(3):379-84. PubMed ID: 11654996
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Ethical considerations in relation to pain in animal experimentation.
Zimmermann M
Acta Physiol Scand; 1986; 128(Suppl. 554):221-33. PubMed ID: 11649998
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Behavioral research and animal welfare.
Gluck JP; Shapiro KJ
Ethics Behav; 1997; 7(2):185-92. PubMed ID: 11655132
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. The ethical judgment of animal research.
Galvin SL; Herzog HA
Ethics Behav; 1992; 2(4):263-86. PubMed ID: 11651614
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Moral community and the responsibility of scientists.
Caplan A
Acta Physiol Scand; 1986; 128(Suppl. 554):78-90. PubMed ID: 11650004
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Education and training: a basis for the introduction of the three Rs alternatives into animal research.
van Zutphen BF; van der Valk JB
Altern Lab Anim; 1995; 23(1):123-7. PubMed ID: 11660272
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Laboratory animals need only humane treatment: animal "rights" may debase human rights.
Landsell H
Int J Neurosci; 1988; 42():169-78. PubMed ID: 11650873
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Animal experimentation ethics from an experimenter's point of view.
Ehinger BE
Acta Physiol Scand; 1986; 128(Suppl. 554):69-77. PubMed ID: 11650003
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. The development of the three Rs concept.
Russell WM
Altern Lab Anim; 1995; 23(3):298-304. PubMed ID: 11656565
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. The patient-physician relationship in clinical trials: an ethical dilemma?
Hill TP
Mak Rounds Health Faith Ethics; 1996 Jun; 1(19):5-7. PubMed ID: 11654392
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Improving standards for laboratory animals.
Brown GE
Congr Rec (Dly Ed); 1984 May; 130(70):E2453-6. PubMed ID: 11658688
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Animal research: a call for legislative reform requiring ethical merit review.
Brody M
HELR Harvard Environ Law Rev; 1989; 13(2):423-84. PubMed ID: 11659214
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Laboratory animal studies: poor design + faulty analysis = unnecessary suffering.
Balls M
Altern Lab Anim; 1994; 22(5):308-9. PubMed ID: 11659930
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Religion and the use of animals in research: some first thoughts.
Smith DH
Ethics Behav; 1997; 7(2):137-47. PubMed ID: 11655128
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The moral status of animals and the Animals (Scientific Procedures) Act 1986.
Balls EM
ATLA Abstr; 1989 Jun; 16(4):353-7. PubMed ID: 11659173
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. The three Rs: a restrictive and refutable rigmarole.
Lansdell H
Ethics Behav; 1993; 3(2):177-85. PubMed ID: 11652253
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Animal research.
Schwartz RH; Cramer M; Natelson N; Cohen MJ; Dodds WJ; Abrams SA; Abrams JZ
Moment; 1995 Apr; 20(2):14-18, 20. PubMed ID: 11660003
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
