365 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11656576)
1. Animal advisors forced into the open.
Kleiner K
New Sci; 1997 Jan; 153(2066):9. PubMed ID: 11656576
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Recombinant DNA research; actions under guidelines; notice.
U.S. National Institutes of Health
Fed Regist; 1985 Mar; 50(47):9760-7. PubMed ID: 11655783
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Interspecies gene-transfer ban rejected.
Miller JA
Sci News; 1984 Nov; 126(18):278. PubMed ID: 11653585
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Animal research: a call for legislative reform requiring ethical merit review.
Brody M
HELR Harvard Environ Law Rev; 1989; 13(2):423-84. PubMed ID: 11659214
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Animal rights and wrongs.
Stryker J
Healthscan; 1984; 1(3):3-10. PubMed ID: 11658711
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Regulation of animal experimentation: United States of America.
Orlans FB
Acta Physiol Scand; 1986; 128(Suppl. 554):138-52. PubMed ID: 11649993
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Recombinant DNA research: proposed actions under the guidelines.
U.S. National Institutes of Health
Fed Regist; 1997 Aug; 62(161):44387-90. PubMed ID: 11658086
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Beyond Animal Legal Defense Fund v. Quigg: the controversy over transgenic animal patents continues.
Hecht EJ
Am Univ Law Rev; 1992; 41(3):1023-74. PubMed ID: 11652629
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. More research using lower animals urged.
Rensberger B
Washington Post; 1985 May; ():A11. PubMed ID: 11647791
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. US backs gene swaps in mammals.
Joyce C
New Sci; 1984 Nov; 104(1428):7. PubMed ID: 11655673
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Gene panel rejects ban: interspecies transfer seen useful by NIH.
Russell C
Washington Post; 1984 Oct; ():A8. PubMed ID: 11646404
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Recombinant DNA research; proposed actions under guidelines.
U.S. National Institutes of Health
Fed Regist; 1985 Dec; 50(245):52176-8. PubMed ID: 11655732
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Animal experimentation: issues for the 1980s.
Zola JC; Sechzer JA; Sieber JE; Griffin A
Sci Technol Human Values; 1984; 9(2):40-50. PubMed ID: 11650677
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Access to animal care committees.
Francione GL
Rutgers Law Rev; 1990; 43(1):1-14. PubMed ID: 11651138
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Health Research Extension Act of 1985. Public Law 99-158.
United States
US Statut Large; 1985; 99(Title IV Sections 1-12):. PubMed ID: 11686169
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Recombinant DNA research; availability of environmental assessment for public comment; request for comments on need for a programmatic environmental impact statement; notice.
U.S. National Institutes of Health
Fed Regist; 1985 Apr; 50(72):14794-6. PubMed ID: 11645548
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. USDA using human gene in effort to grow super livestock.
Russell C
Washington Post; 1984 Oct; ():A1, A7. PubMed ID: 11646405
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. NIH modifies gene therapy research guidelines.
Levine C
Hastings Cent Rep; 1985 Jun; 15(3):2-3. PubMed ID: 11643786
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Animal welfare group seeks ban on MAbs from mouse ascites.
Lewin DI
J NIH Res; 1997 Jul; 9(7):22-3. PubMed ID: 11656640
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Of mice and medicine: balancing scientific needs and animal welfare.
Iglehart JK
Washington Post; 1985 Sep; ():Health Su-15. PubMed ID: 11647799
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
