These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

244 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 11656585)

  • 21. Report on Australian national conference: "Surrogacy -- In Whose Interest?", Melbourne, February 1991.
    Salomone J
    Issues Reprod Genet Eng; 1992; 5(1):79-94. PubMed ID: 11651336
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Response of Professor Field.
    Field MA
    Politics Life Sci; 1991 Feb; 9(2):262-8. PubMed ID: 11656634
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Wombs for rent, selves for sale?
    Smith DH
    J Contemp Health Law Policy; 1988; 4():23-36. PubMed ID: 11645611
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. In the matter of Baby M: rejudged.
    Raymond JG
    Reprod Genet Eng; 1988; 1(2):175-81. PubMed ID: 11650375
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Touchdowns, toddlers, and taboos: on paying college athletes and surrogate contract mothers.
    Rush SE
    Ariz Law Rev; 1989; 31(3):549-614. PubMed ID: 11659320
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Rumpelstiltskin revisited: the inalienable rights of surrogate mothers.
    Harv Law Rev; 1986 Jun; 99(8):1936-55. PubMed ID: 11655817
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The rights of the biological father: from adoption and custody to surrogate motherhood.
    Stanton ER
    Vt Law Rev; 1987; 12(1):87-121. PubMed ID: 11658956
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Babies for sale.
    Fox R
    Public Interest; 1993; 11():14-40. PubMed ID: 11656370
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The surrogate mother contract: in the best interests of society?
    Latourette AW
    Univ Richmond Law Rev; 1990; 25(1):53-92. PubMed ID: 11651389
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Draft report on surrogacy issued by the Australian National Bioethics Consultative Committee -- the debate on surrogacy in Australia continues Response to the draft report of the National Bioethics Consultative Committee (NBCC), Surrogacy.
    Ewing C; Rowland R
    Issues Reprod Genet Eng; 1990; 3(2):143-57. PubMed ID: 11650919
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The ethics of babymaking.
    Sherwin S
    Hastings Cent Rep; 1995; 25(2):34-7. PubMed ID: 11644700
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Alternative reproduction.
    Andrews LB; Douglass L
    South Calif Law Rev; 1991 Nov; 65(1):623-82. PubMed ID: 11645847
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The itinerant embryo and the neo-nativity scene: bifurcating biological maternity.
    O'Brien S
    Utah Law Rev; 1987; 1987-1(1):1-33. PubMed ID: 11658919
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. A case against pregnancy contracts: embodied selves, liberal theory and the law.
    Shanley ML
    Politics Life Sci; 1990 Feb; 8(2):216-20. PubMed ID: 11650314
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Medical decision making during a surrogate pregnancy.
    Mayo TW
    Houst Law Rev; 1988 May; 25(3):599-644. PubMed ID: 11649257
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Commodification and commercial surrogacy.
    Arneson RJ
    Philos Public Aff; 1992; 21(2):132-64. PubMed ID: 11651242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Restricting surrogacy to married couples: a constitutional problem? The married-parent requirement in the Uniform Status of Children of Assisted Conception Act.
    Massie AM
    Hastings Constit Law Q; 1991; 18(3):487-540. PubMed ID: 11651494
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Assisted reproductive technology and the family.
    Robertson JA
    Hastings Law J; 1996 Apr; 47(4):911-33. PubMed ID: 11656838
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Baby M trial splits ranks of feminists.
    Peterson I
    N Y Times Web; 1987 Feb; ():B1, B2. PubMed ID: 11646569
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. How (not) to think about surrogacy and other reproductive innovations.
    Shapiro MH
    Univ San Francisco Law Rev; 1994; 28(3):647-80. PubMed ID: 11655181
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.